ArticlePloS one2019
Diagnostic performance of the molecular BCR-ABL1 monitoring system may impact on inclusion of CML patients in stopping trials.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital PCR (dPCR) is able to anticipate the achievement of stable deep molecular response in adult chronic myeloid leukemia patients: results of the DEMONSTRATE study.Annals of hematology · 2025Trial
- Molecular response and quality of life in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with intermittent TKIs: First interim analysis of OPTkIMA study.Cancer medicine · 2021Trial
- One Target, Different Results: The Clinical Impact of Diagnostic Kit Choice inDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical, morphological and genetic characteristics of patients with concurrent presence of JAK2 V617F and BCR::ABL1.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Management of Adult Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?Cancers · 2024Review
- Article
- Gene Expression Pattern ofCancers · 2023Article
- A new aberrantly splicedEJHaem · 2022Article
- Molecular Testing in CML between Old and New Methods: Are We at a Turning Point?Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Prognosis and Therapy: Criticisms and Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- DNA Damage and DNA Damage Response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Relative quantification of BCL2 mRNA for diagnostic usage needs stable uncontrolled genes as reference.PloS one · 2020Observational
- Current Strategies and Future Directions to Achieve Deep Molecular Response and Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- RT-qPCR versus Digital PCR: How Do They Impact Differently on Clinical Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients?Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the duration of deep molecular response (MR) before treatment cessation (MR4 or deeper, corresponding to BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.01% on the International Scale (IS)) is considered as a prognostic factor for treatment free remission in stopping trials. MR level determination is dependent on the sensitivity of the monitoring technique. Here, we compared a newly established TaqMan (TM) and our so far routinely used LightCycler (LC) quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)-PCR systems for their ability to achieve the best possible sensitivity in BCR-ABL1 monitoring. We have comparatively analyzed RNA samples from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 92 randomly chosen patients with CML resembling major molecular remission (MMR) or better and of 128 CML patients after treatment cessation (EURO-SKI stopping trial). While our LC system utilized ABL1, the TM system is based on GUSB as reference gene. We observed 99% concordance with respect to achievement of MMR. However, we found that 34 of the 92 patients monitored by TM/GUSB were re-classified to the next inferior MR log level, especially when LC/ABL1-based results were borderline to thresholds. Thirteen patients BCR-ABL1 negative in LC/ABL1 became positive after TM/GUSB analysis. In the 128 patients included in the EURO-SKI trial identical molecular findings were achieved for 114 patients. However, 14 patients were re-classified to the next inferior log-level by the TM/GUSB combination. Eight of these patients relapsed after treatment cessation; two of them were re-classified from MR4 to MMR and therefore did not meet inclusion criteria anymore. In conclusion, we consider both methods as comparable and interchangeable in terms of achievement of MMR and of longitudinal evaluation of clinical courses. However, in LC/ABL1 negative samples, slightly enhanced TM/GUSB sensitivity may lead to inferior classification of clinical samples in the context of TFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.