Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30897124›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Quiet standing: The Single Inverted Pendulum model is not so bad after all.

Pietro Morasso, Amel Cherif, Jacopo Zenzeri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
31.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Slow dynamics of human balance control.Scientific reports · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. What is Balance? A Vital Mechano-Regulation Paradigm.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pietro MorassoDepartment of Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Amel CherifDepartment of Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Jacopo ZenzeriDepartment of Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5536-1960
Italian Institute of Technology · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the study of balance and postural control the (Single) Inverted Pendulum model (SIP) has been taken for a long time as an acceptable paradigm, with the implicit assumption that only ankle rotations are relevant for describing and explaining sway movements. However, more recent kinematic analysis of quiet standing revealed that hip motion cannot be neglected at all and that ankle-hip oscillatory patterns are characterized by complex in-phase and anti-phase interactions, suggesting that the SIP model should be substituted by a DIP (Double Inverted Pendulum) model. It was also suggested that DIP control could be characterized as a kind of optimal bi-axial active controller whose goal is minimizing the acceleration of the global CoM (Center of Mass). We propose here an alternative where active feedback control is applied in an intermittent manner only to the ankle joint, whereas the hip joint is stabilized by a passive stiffness mechanism. The active control impulses are delivered to the ankle joint as a function of the delayed state vector (tilt rotation angle + tilt rotational speed) of a Virtual Inverted Pendulum (VIP), namely a pendulum that links the ankle to the CoM, embedded in the real DIP. Simulations of such DIP/VIP model, with the hybrid control mechanism, show that it can reproduce the in-phase/anti-phase interaction patterns of the two joints described by several experimental studies. Moreover, the simulations demonstrate that the DIP/VIP model can also reproduce the measured minimization of the CoM acceleration, as an indirect biomechanical consequence of the dynamic interaction between the active control of the ankle joint and the passive control of the hip joint. We suggest that although the SIP model is literally false, because it ignores the ankle-hip coordination, it is functionally correct and practically acceptable for experimental studies that focus on the postural oscillations of the CoM.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaHip JointHumansStanding Position

Identifiers

PMID30897124
PMCPMC6428281
OpenAlexW2923675576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.