Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30897101›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

High Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) and competitions: How motives differ by length of participation.

Allyson G Box, Yuri Feito, Chris Brown, Katie M Heinrich, Steven J Petruzzello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allyson G BoxDepartment of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States of America.
Yuri FeitoDepartment of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6790-6294
Chris BrownDepartment of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, United States of America.
Katie M HeinrichDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States of America.
Steven J PetruzzelloDepartment of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) is a unique fitness method that promotes an active lifestyle and has seen exponential and continual growth over the last two decades. Motivation to exercise is likely to change over time as individuals' motives to initiate exercise may be different than those which motivate them to maintain an exercise program. The purpose of this study was to examine the motivational factors reported by individuals who actively engage in HIFT with varying length of participation and competition levels. 737 adults (32.4 ± 8.2 years) with more than three-months of HIFT experience completed an online version of the Exercise Motivation Inventory (EMI-2) survey. Those who had greater length of participation reported more motives associated with relatedness (i.e., affiliation, competition) and enjoyment, while those with less HIFT participation were more motivated by body-related variables (i.e., weight management). Further, motivational variables (e.g., social recognition, affiliation, challenge) varied depending on whether or not individuals had competed in an online qualifier. Understanding these differences in motivation may aid in exercise promotion, initiation, and adherence, and moreover promote long-term physical and mental health benefits.

Indexed as

MotivationAdolescentAdultAgedCompetitive BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30897101
PMCPMC6428326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.