ArticlePLoS computational biology2019
Contrasting the effects of adaptation and synaptic filtering on the timescales of dynamics in recurrent networks.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frequency-dependent coupling in response to oscillatory inputs in minimal networks of electrically coupled nodes: Gap junction networks and spatially extended neurons.Biological cybernetics · 2026Article
- Neural timescales from a computational perspective.Nature neuroscience · 2026Review
- A theory for self-sustained balanced states in absence of strong external currents.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Postsynaptic frequency filters shaped by the interplay of synaptic short-term plasticity and cellular time scales.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Brain-wide organization of intrinsic timescales at single-neuron resolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Human attention-guided visual perception is governed by rhythmic oscillations and aperiodic timescales.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Morphological variability may limit single-cell specificity to electric field stimulation.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2025Article
- Fast nonlinear integration drives accurate encoding of input information in large multiscale systems.Communications physics · 2025Article
- Intrinsic timescales in the visual cortex change with selective attention and reflect spatial connectivity.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Heterogeneity in Neuronal Dynamics Is Learned by Gradient Descent for Temporal Processing Tasks.Neural computation · 2023Article
- Neural adaptation and fractional dynamics as a window to underlying neural excitability.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Relating local connectivity and global dynamics in recurrent excitatory-inhibitory networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Article
- The brain and its time: intrinsic neural timescales are key for input processing.Communications biology · 2021Review
- Article
- Biophysically grounded mean-field models of neural populations under electrical stimulation.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- How single neuron properties shape chaotic dynamics and signal transmission in random neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Theory of Gating in Recurrent Neural Networks.Physical review. XArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neural activity in awake behaving animals exhibits a vast range of timescales that can be several fold larger than the membrane time constant of individual neurons. Two types of mechanisms have been proposed to explain this conundrum. One possibility is that large timescales are generated by a network mechanism based on positive feedback, but this hypothesis requires fine-tuning of the strength or structure of the synaptic connections. A second possibility is that large timescales in the neural dynamics are inherited from large timescales of underlying biophysical processes, two prominent candidates being intrinsic adaptive ionic currents and synaptic transmission. How the timescales of adaptation or synaptic transmission influence the timescale of the network dynamics has however not been fully explored. To address this question, here we analyze large networks of randomly connected excitatory and inhibitory units with additional degrees of freedom that correspond to adaptation or synaptic filtering. We determine the fixed points of the systems, their stability to perturbations and the corresponding dynamical timescales. Furthermore, we apply dynamical mean field theory to study the temporal statistics of the activity in the fluctuating regime, and examine how the adaptation and synaptic timescales transfer from individual units to the whole population. Our overarching finding is that synaptic filtering and adaptation in single neurons have very different effects at the network level. Unexpectedly, the macroscopic network dynamics do not inherit the large timescale present in adaptive currents. In contrast, the timescales of network activity increase proportionally to the time constant of the synaptic filter. Altogether, our study demonstrates that the timescales of different biophysical processes have different effects on the network level, so that the slow processes within individual neurons do not necessarily induce slow activity in large recurrent neural networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.