Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30897088›Full record

Trial reportPLoS biology2019

Chronotopic maps in human supplementary motor area.

Foteini Protopapa, Masamichi J Hayashi, Shrikanth Kulashekhar, Wietske van der Zwaag, Giovanni Battistella, Micah M Murray, Ryota Kanai, Domenica Bueti

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Neural signatures of serial order access in verbal working memory.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neural Tuning for Ordinal Processing: Convergent Patterns in Human Brains and Artificial Networks.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Whole-Brain Topographic Ontology.Annual review of neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Foteini ProtopapaInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy.
Masamichi J HayashiGlobal Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2631-5177
Shrikanth KulashekharInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy.
Wietske van der ZwaagAnimal Imaging and Technology, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3223-9721
Giovanni BattistellaDepartment of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Micah M MurrayThe Laboratory for Investigative Neurophysiology (The LINE), Department of Radiology and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7821-117X
Ryota KanaiSackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0186-2687
Domenica BuetiInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6660-7241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time is a fundamental dimension of everyday experiences. We can unmistakably sense its passage and adjust our behavior accordingly. Despite its ubiquity, the neuronal mechanisms underlying the capacity to perceive time remains unclear. Here, in two experiments using ultrahigh-field 7-Tesla (7T) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we show that in the medial premotor cortex (supplementary motor area [SMA]) of the human brain, neural units tuned to different durations are orderly mapped in contiguous portions of the cortical surface so as to form chronomaps. The response of each portion in a chronomap is enhanced by neighboring durations and suppressed by nonpreferred durations represented in distant portions of the map. These findings suggest duration-sensitive tuning as a possible neural mechanism underlying the recognition of time and demonstrate, for the first time, that the representation of an abstract feature such as time can be instantiated by a topographical arrangement of duration-sensitive neural populations.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor ActivityMotor CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30897088
PMCPMC6428248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.