Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30897078›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2019

Comprehensive profiling of the STE20 kinase family defines features essential for selective substrate targeting and signaling output.

Chad J Miller, Hua Jane Lou, Craig Simpson, Bert van de Kooij, Byung Hak Ha, Oriana S Fisher, Natasha L Pirman, Titus J Boggon, Jesse Rinehart, Michael B Yaffe and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expanding the phenotype and genotype spectrum of TAOK1 neurodevelopmental disorder and delineating TAOK2 neurodevelopmental disorder.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The role of TAOK3 in cancer progression and development as a prognostic marker: A pan-cancer analysis study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Rho family GTPase signaling through type II p21-activated kinases.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Paternal De Novo Variant ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chad J MillerDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Hua Jane LouDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Craig SimpsonBiotech Research and Innovation Center, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bert van de KooijDepartments of Biological Engineering and Biology, MIT Center for Precision Cancer Medicine and Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Byung Hak HaDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Oriana S FisherDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Natasha L PirmanDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology and Systems Biology Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Titus J BoggonDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Jesse RinehartDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology and Systems Biology Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Michael B YaffeDepartments of Biological Engineering and Biology, MIT Center for Precision Cancer Medicine and Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Rune LindingBiotech Research and Innovation Center, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Benjamin E TurkDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9275-4069
Yale University · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Translational CoreP01DK057751 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, XIAOYONG · 2001 to 2020
$25.6M
INSTITUTIONAL NATIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE AWARDT32GM007324 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BENNETT, ANTON M · 1987 to 2022
$6.2M
Structure-directed investigations into the regulation of Ste20 kinasesR01GM102262 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BOGGON, TITUS JONATHON · 2012 to 2025
$4.2M
Protein Kinase Signaling in the Genotoxic Stress ResponseR35ES028374 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI YAFFE, MICHAEL B · 2017 to 2024
$3.9M
Modeling human phosphorylation networks through kinome-wide profilingR01GM104047 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TURK, BENJAMIN E, YAFFE, MICHAEL B · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK057751NIEHS NIH HHS R35 ES028374NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102262NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104047NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specificity within protein kinase signaling cascades is determined by direct and indirect interactions between kinases and their substrates. While the impact of localization and recruitment on kinase-substrate targeting can be readily assessed, evaluating the relative importance of direct phosphorylation site interactions remains challenging. In this study, we examine the STE20 family of protein serine-threonine kinases to investigate basic mechanisms of substrate targeting. We used peptide arrays to define the phosphorylation site specificity for the majority of STE20 kinases and categorized them into four distinct groups. Using structure-guided mutagenesis, we identified key specificity-determining residues within the kinase catalytic cleft, including an unappreciated role for the kinase β3-αC loop region in controlling specificity. Exchanging key residues between the STE20 kinases p21-activated kinase 4 (PAK4) and Mammalian sterile 20 kinase 4 (MST4) largely interconverted their phosphorylation site preferences. In cells, a reprogrammed PAK4 mutant, engineered to recognize MST substrates, failed to phosphorylate PAK4 substrates or to mediate remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton. In contrast, this mutant could rescue signaling through the Hippo pathway in cells lacking multiple MST kinases. These observations formally demonstrate the importance of catalytic site specificity for directing protein kinase signal transduction pathways. Our findings further suggest that phosphorylation site specificity is both necessary and sufficient to mediate distinct signaling outputs of STE20 kinases and imply broad applicability to other kinase signaling systems.

Indexed as

CatalysisCell LineHippo KinasesHumansMutagenesisp21-Activated KinasesPhosphorylationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSignal TransductionHippo Kinasesp21-Activated KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSTK26 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30897078
PMCPMC6445471
OpenAlexW2923146595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.