ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2019
Improving the Performance of the Amber RNA Force Field by Tuning the Hydrogen-Bonding Interactions.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Conformational Transitions of Adenine RNA Dimer via Machine Learning Potentials.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- From gHBfix to NBfix: Reweighting-Driven Refinement of Hydrogen-Bond Interactions in RNA Force Fields.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- A magic methyl effect in the active site of a methyltransferase ribozyme.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Toward Accurate RNA Folding Thermodynamics: Evaluation of Enhanced Sampling Methods for Force Field Benchmarking.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- U2 snRNP recognizes the branch site through a loaded-spring strand-invasion mechanism.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Destabilization of Structured RNAs by OPC and TIP4PD Water Models.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Interaction of Carbon Dots with Nucleic Acids Is Driven by Their Surface Charge.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- The Kink-Turn 7 Motif: An Additional Test for RNA Force Field Performance.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Success and Limitations of Current Force Fields for the Description of RNA-Ligand Complexes.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Molecular Dynamics Simulations of RNA Stem-Loop Folding Using an Atomistic Force Field and a Generalized Born Implicit Solvent.ACS omega · 2025Article
- DynaRNA: accurate dynamic RNA conformation ensemble generation with diffusion model.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Sequence-Dependent Shape and Stiffness of DNA and RNA Double Helices: Hexanucleotide Scale and Beyond.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Kinetics and dynamics of oligonucleotide hybridization.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2025Review
- Can We Ever Develop an Ideal RNA Force Field? Lessons Learned from Simulations of the UUCG RNA Tetraloop and Other Systems.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Computational Methods for Modeling Lipid-Mediated Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Delivery.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- The Unpaved Road of Non-Coding RNA Structure-Function Relationships: Current Knowledge, Available Methodologies, and Future Trends.Non-coding RNA · 2025Review
- How Binding Site Flexibility Promotes RNA Scanning by TbRGG2 RRM: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Computer Folding of Parallel DNA G-Quadruplex: Hitchhiker's Guide to the Conformational Space.Journal of computational chemistry · 2025Article
- Atomistic Simulations Reveal Crucial Role of Metal Ions for Ligand Binding in Guanidine-I Riboswitch.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2024Article
- Coarse-grained modeling of DNA-protein interactions helps elucidate DNA compaction.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations became a leading tool for investigation of structural dynamics of nucleic acids. Despite recent efforts to improve the empirical potentials (force fields, ffs), RNA ffs have persisting deficiencies, which hamper their utilization in quantitatively accurate simulations. Previous studies have shown that at least two salient problems contribute to difficulties in the description of free-energy landscapes of small RNA motifs: (i) excessive stabilization of the unfolded single-stranded RNA ensemble by intramolecular base-phosphate and sugar-phosphate interactions and (ii) destabilization of the native folded state by underestimation of stability of base pairing. Here, we introduce a general ff term (gHBfix) that can selectively fine-tune nonbonding interaction terms in RNA ffs, in particular, the H bonds. The gHBfix potential affects the pairwise interactions between all possible pairs of the specific atom types, while all other interactions remain intact; i.e., it is not a structure-based model. In order to probe the ability of the gHBfix potential to refine the ff nonbonded terms, we performed an extensive set of folding simulations of RNA tetranucleotides and tetraloops. On the basis of these data, we propose particular gHBfix parameters to modify the AMBER RNA ff. The suggested parametrization significantly improves the agreement between experimental data and the simulation conformational ensembles, although our current ff version still remains far from being flawless. While attempts to tune the RNA ffs by conventional reparametrizations of dihedral potentials or nonbonded terms can lead to major undesired side effects, as we demonstrate for some recently published ffs, gHBfix has a clear promising potential to improve the ff performance while avoiding introduction of major new imbalances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.