ArticleBritish journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)2019
Consolidation, wider reflection, and policy: Response to 'Super-recognisers: From the lab to the world and back again'.
Article in British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- When two fields collide: Identifying "super-recognisers" for neuropsychological and forensic face recognition research.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2021Review
- Psychophysical profiles in super-recognizers.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Normative data for two challenging tests of face matching under ecological conditions.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2020Article
- Towards a 'manifesto' for super-recognizer research.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here, David Robertson and Markus Bindemann respond to a recent BJP Target Article on 'super-recognisers' (SRs). They outline the need to consider human factors that could influence SR performance after selection and the need for a co-ordinated effort to ensure best practice in the implementation of SRs in applied contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30896888What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.