Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30896654›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2019

Preoperative colonoscopy in patients with a supposed primary ovarian cancer.

Renata Raś, Edyta Barnaś, Joanna Skręt- Magierło, Anna Drozdzowska, Ewelina Bartosiewicz, Marek Sobolewski, Andrzej Skręt, Krzysztof Gutkowski

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Primary and metastatic peritoneal surface malignancies.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021
    Review
  7. Ovary unusual colonic lesion.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Renata RaśObstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Clinical Hospital No1 Rzeszow, University of Rzeszow.
Edyta BarnaśMedical Faculty, University of Rzeszow.
Joanna Skręt- MagierłoObstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Clinical Hospital No1 Rzeszow, University of Rzeszow.
Anna DrozdzowskaObstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Clinical Hospital No1 Rzeszow, University of Rzeszow.
Ewelina BartosiewiczDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology with the Internal Diseases Unit, Clinical Hospital No.1.
Marek SobolewskiDepartment of Quantitative Methods, Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszow, Poland.
Andrzej SkrętObstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Clinical Hospital No1 Rzeszow, University of Rzeszow.
Krzysztof GutkowskiMedical Faculty, University of Rzeszow.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The final diagnosis of ovarian cancer is based on surgery and pathological verification. Therefore patients who are presented to surgery may be described only as supposed ovarian cancer. According to the literature the diagnosis of ovarian cancer is confirmed only in 2/3 of them. The rest are that which mimic ovarian cancer. One of them is colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy is a gold standard in its diagnostics. On the other hand, ovarian cancer may disturb the bowel patency and makes the bowel resection or stoma necessary.The main aim was to find out the distribution of bowel patency disturbances in ovarian cancer patients during preoperative colonoscopy and to assess their predictive value with respect to the bowel resection or stoma and the additional aim to identify the pathologies which mimic the ovarian cancer.In a prospective study among 104 patients with supposed ovarian cancer, primary ovarian cancer was diagnosed in 68 patients. The rest of them suffered from colorectal cancer found at colonoscopy (N = 6), ovarian benign pathology (N = 8), ovarian borderline tumor (N = 5), and other nonandexal malignant diseases (N = 17). In ovarian cancer group dominated serous carcinoma and fedération international de gynécologie et d'obstétrique stage 3 (N = 33).During preoperative colonoscopy in ovarian cancer patients, the complete obstruction was found in 27.9%, and relative risk of bowel resection or stoma was in them 4.29 and 4.38, respectively. Another colonoscopic finding was limited patency caused by extrinsic compression (29%) which is connected with relative risk of bowel resection or stoma 3.16 and 3.21 accordingly. The last colonoscopy finding was described as moderate limited patency of unknown origin (20.6%) and the relative risk of bowel resection or stoma was 5.14 and 4.17, respectively.Colonoscopy enables the diagnoses of colorectal cancer one of the diseases which mimic ovarian cancer in patients supposed to have this diseases.Bowel patency disturbances found at colonoscopy are a potential risk factor to intestine resection or ostomy.Colonoscopy is not fully noninvasive procedure and its obligatory use in patients supposed to have ovarian cancer should be limited to the cases with specific symptoms, and tumor marker pattern. Preoperative computed tomography, dedicated to bowel examination, candidates as an alternative to colonoscopy, but not completely.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30896654
PMCPMC6709016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.