Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30896634›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2019

Continuous blood purification for severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yong Hu, Wenjun Xiong, Chunyan Li, Yunfeng Cui

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Admission hematocrit and fluctuating blood urea nitrogen levels predict the efficacy of blood purification treatment in severe acute pancreatitis patients.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration for severe acute pancreatitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yong HuTianjin Medical University, No. 22, Qixiangtai Road, Heping District.
Wenjun XiongDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Chunyan LiTianjin Medical University, No. 22, Qixiangtai Road, Heping District.
Yunfeng CuiDepartment of Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Nankai Clinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, 122 Sanwei Road Nankai District, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Medical University · CNTianjin Nankai Hospital · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of acute pancreatitis (AP) is rising around the world, thus further increasing the burden on healthcare services. Approximately 20% of AP will develop severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) with persistent organ failure (>48 h), which is the leading cause of high mortality. To date, there is no specific drug in treating SAP, and the main treatment is still based on supportive care. However, some clinical control studies regarding the superiority of continuous blood purification (CBP) has been published recently. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of CBP in SAP treatment.

methodsFour databases (Medline, SinoMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) were searched for eligible studies from 1980 to 2018 containing a total of 4 randomized controlled trials and 8 prospective studies.

resultsAfter the analysis of data amenable to polling, significant advantages were found in favor of the CBP approach in terms of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score (WMD = -3.00,95%CI = -4.65 to -1.35), serum amylase (WMD = -237.14, 95% CI = -292.77 to 181.31), serum creatinine (WMD = -80.54,95%CI = 160.17 to -0.92), length of stay in the ICU (WMD = -7.15,95%CI = -9.88 to -4.43), and mortality (OR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.38-0.94). No marked differences were found in terms of C-reactive protein (CRP), alamine aminotransferase (ALT) and length of hospital stay (LOS).

conclusionCompared with conventional treatment, CBP remedy evidently improved clinical outcomes, including reduced incidence organ failure, decreased serum amylase, APACHE II score, length of stay in the ICU and lower mortality rate, leading us to conclude that it is a safer treatment option for SAP. Furthermore, relevant multicenter RCTs are required to prove these findings.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAPACHEHemofiltrationHumansInflammation MediatorsLength of StayMultiple Organ FailurePancreatitisProspective StudiesInflammation Mediators

Identifiers

PMID30896634
PMCPMC6708963
OpenAlexW2922633678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.