Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30896617›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2019

Clinical features and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of culture-proven neonatal sepsis in a tertiary children's hospital, 2013 to 2017.

Xiaoxia Li, Xiangyu Ding, Peng Shi, Yiqing Zhu, Yidie Huang, Qin Li, Jinmiao Lu, Zhiping Li, Lin Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoxia LiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy.
Xiangyu DingDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy.
Peng ShiDepartment of Medical Statistics, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yiqing ZhuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy.
Yidie HuangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy.
Qin LiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy.
Jinmiao LuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy.
Zhiping LiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy.
Lin Zhu
Children's Hospital of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal sepsis (NS) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates, but data on the etiology and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of pathogens are limited. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of pathogenic microbes associated with NS at a tertiary children's hospital in Shanghai, China.Episodes of blood culture-proven sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Children's Hospital of Fudan University from January 2013 to August 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Collected data included demographics, perinatal risk factors, clinical symptoms, laboratory values, microbiology results and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Data for early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) and late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONS) were compared.The 341 of 976 culture-positive cases were selected, including 161 EONS cases (47.21% of 341) and 180 LONS cases (52.79% of 341). 635 incomplete cases were excluded. There was significant difference in risk factors between the EONS group and LONS group including birth weight, gestational age, 1-minute Apgar score, respiratory support, and the use of peripherally insertion central catheter (PICC). Clinical symptoms such as fever, feeding intolerance, abdominal distension, and neonatal jaundice, and laboratory results such as hemoglobin and lymphocyte counts also showed between-group differences. Staphylococcus epidermidis (22.87%), Escherichia coli (9.68%), Alcaligenes xylosoxidans (9.38%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (9.09%) remain the principal organisms responsible for neonatal sepsis. Most isolates of Gram-positive bacteria were sensitive to vancomycin, linezolid, minocycline and tigecycline, of which more than 90% were resistant to penicillin. Most isolates of Gram-negative bacteria were sensitive to amikacin and imipenem and resistant to ampicillin. Fungus was sensitive to antifungal agents. Better medical decisions, especially early detection and appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy can be made after understanding the different clinical features and pathogens of EONS and LONS.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsApgar ScoreBirth WeightGestational AgeHematologic TestsHospitals, PediatricHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMicrobiological TechniquesNeonatal SepsisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsTertiary Care CentersAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID30896617
PMCPMC6709008
OpenAlexW2924803863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.