ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2019
A pragmatist's guide to the assessment of decision-making capacity.
Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Designing Consent Processes for Research With Older Adults Who May Lack Decisional Capacity: A Guide for Investigators.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Informed consent competency assessment for brain-computer interface clinical research and application in psychiatric disorders: A systematic review.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Supported decision making: Facilitating the self-determination of persons living with Alzheimer's and related diseases.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Article
- Applying decision-making capacity criteria in practice: A content analysis of court judgments.PloS one · 2021Article
- End-of-life decision-making capacity in an elderly patient with schizophrenia and terminal cancer.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2020Article
- Adolescents' healthcare decisional capacity in the clinical context: a theoretical study and model.Jornal de pediatriaReview
- Is the capacity to consent different from the capacity to refuse treatments and procedures in adolescence?Jornal de pediatriaReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byAuthors' reply.2019
- Commented on by
- Commented on byAuthors' reply.2020
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Choice, understanding, appreciation and reasoning compose the standard model of decision-making capacity. Difficulties in determining capacity can arise when patients exhibit partial impairment. We suggest that a pragmatic approach, focusing on how capacity status affects the ultimate decision to override the patient's wishes, can help evaluators resolve difficult cases.Declaration of interestNone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.