Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30896342›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2019

Applied Bioengineering in Tissue Reconstruction, Replacement, and Regeneration.

Juan M Colazo, Brian C Evans, Angel F Farinas, Salam Al-Kassis, Craig L Duvall, Wesley P Thayer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan M Colazo1Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Brian C Evans3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Angel F Farinas4Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Salam Al-Kassis4Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Craig L Duvall3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Wesley P Thayer3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007347 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER S. · 1985 to 2023
$26.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

impact statementThe use of autologous tissue in the reconstruction of tissue defects has been the gold standard. However, current standards still face many limitations and complications. Improving patient outcomes and quality of life by addressing these barriers remain imperative. This article provides historical perspective, covers the major limitations of current standards of care, and reviews recent advances and future prospects in applied bioengineering in the context of tissue reconstruction, replacement, and regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBioengineeringHumansRegenerative MedicineTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materialsbiomaterialsdonor-site morbiditydrug deliverygenetic engineeringimmunobiologyreconstructive surgeryregenerative medicinestem cellstissue engineeringtissue replacementwound healing

Identifiers

PMID30896342
PMCPMC6686706
OpenAlexW2922821399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.