Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30896220›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2019

Delay discounting and household food purchasing decisions: The SHoPPER study.

Bradley M Appelhans, Christy C Tangney, Simone A French, Melissa M Crane, Yamin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Perceived reward certainty in the assessment of delay discounting.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2025
    Article
  7. Delay Discounting and Risk Tolerance in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: Results From the Global OCD Study.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phenylketonuria as an Adherence Disease.Patient preference and adherence · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bradley M AppelhansDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Rush University Medical Center.
Christy C TangneyDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center.
Simone A FrenchDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota.
Melissa M CraneDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Rush University Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0002-1458-2692
Yamin WangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Rush University Medical Center.

Funding

Delay Discounting and Household Food ChoicesR01HL117804 · NHLBI · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI APPELHANS, BRADLEY M. · 2013 to 2016
$1.9M
National Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDelay discounting is a neurocognitive trait that has been linked to poor nutritional health and obesity, but its role in specific dietary choices is unclear. This study tested whether individual differences in delay discounting are related to the healthfulness of household food purchases and reliance on nonstore food sources such as restaurants.

methodThe food purchases of 202 primary household food shoppers were objectively documented for 14 days through a food receipt collection and analysis protocol. The nutrient content of household food purchases was derived for each participant, and the overall diet quality (Healthy Eating Index-2015) and energy density (kcal/g) of foods and beverages were calculated. The proportion of energy from nonstore food sources was also derived. Delay discounting was assessed with a choice task featuring hypothetical monetary rewards.

resultsData were available for 12,624 foods and beverages purchased across 2,340 shopping episodes. Approximately 13% of energy was purchased from restaurants and other nonstore food sources. Steeper discounting rates were associated with lower overall Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores and a higher energy density (kcal/g) of purchased foods. Associations were attenuated but remained statistically significant when accounting for body mass index and sociodemographic variables. Discounting rates were unrelated to reliance on nonstore food sources or the energy density of purchased beverages.

conclusionsDelay discounting is related to the healthfulness of food purchases among primary household shoppers. As food purchasing is a key antecedent of dietary intake, delay discounting may be a viable target in dietary and weight management interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AdultConsumer BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesDelay DiscountingFemaleFoodHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID30896220
PMCPMC6430149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.