Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30896211›Full record

ReviewPsychological assessment2019

Incorporating neurophysiological measures into clinical assessments: Fundamental challenges and a strategy for addressing them.

Christopher J Patrick, William G Iacono, Noah C Venables

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychological assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Opposing Relations of Reward Positivity with Anhedonia and Threat Sensitivity: Implications for Differential Dimensional Diagnosis.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Variants of the P3 event-related potential operate as indicators of distinct mechanisms contributing to problematic alcohol use.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher J PatrickDepartment of Psychology.
William G IaconoDepartment of Psychology.
Noah C VenablesDepartment of Psychiatry.

Funding

Twin Family Study of Vulnerability to Substance AbuseR37DA005147 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI IACONO, WILLIAM G. · 2009 to 2018
$6.4M
Adult consequences of youth substance use: Twin study enriched for SUD riskR01DA036216 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI IACONO, WILLIAM G. · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
Comorbidity: Substance Use Disorders and Other Psychiatric ConditionsT32DA037183 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Anna Zilverstand · 2014 to 2026
$3.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036216NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA005147NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA037183U.S. Army
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent scientific initiatives have called for increased use of neurobiological variables in clinical and other applied assessments. However, the task of incorporating neural measures into psychological assessments entails significant methodological challenges that have not been effectively addressed to date. As a result, neurophysiological measures remain underutilized in clinical and applied assessments, and formal procedures for integrating such measures with report-based measures are lacking. In this article, we discuss major methodological issues that have impeded progress in this direction, and propose a systematic research strategy for integrating neurophysiological measures into psychological assessment protocols. The strategy we propose is an iterative

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsResearch DesignHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMental DisordersPsychology, ClinicalReward

Identifiers

PMID30896211
PMCPMC6754804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.