Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30896128›Full record

ArticleAnnals of global health2019

Building Blocks of Global Health Mentorship: Motivation, Expectations, and Institutional Support.

Karen Charron, Anna Kalbarczyk, Nina A Martin, Emily A Combs, Marie Ward, Elli Leontsini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Building Capacity for Global Cancer Research: Existing Opportunities and Future Directions.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen CharronDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, US.
Anna KalbarczykJohns Hopkins Center for Global Health, US.
Nina A MartinJohns Hopkins Center for Global Health, US.
Emily A CombsInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, US.
Marie WardDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, US.
Elli LeontsiniDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, US.
Johns Hopkins University · USInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal health education and training experiences are in high demand. Mentorship plays an important role in successful training, but academic institutions often lack formalized mentorship support. This study aimed to evaluate perceptions of global health mentorship across disciplines at Johns Hopkins University and to understand how to better support faculty mentorship for global health training.

methodsThis is a retrospective study that used qualitative methods to assess the perceptions of students who participated in the Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health (CGH) field placement program from 2011-2013 and CGH faculty who may have served as their mentors. Qualitative data was gathered through 30 individual in-depth interviews and 4 focus groups capturing both faculty and student perspectives. Data were analyzed inductively until thematic saturation was reached; a theoretical model, which we call the "building blocks of global health mentorship" model, emerged to serve as an analytical and synthesizing framework.

findingsA series of factors influenced global health mentorship from an individual to institutional level, including motivation, expectation alignment, finances, time, and knowledge. Both students and faculty reported the importance of motivation and aligned expectations to the mentorship experience and, more broadly, the overseas experience. Mentorship relationships were identified by students and faculty as either a catalyst or a hindrance to the training experience from both a personal and a professional point of view. Many faculty mentioned insufficient institutional support and financial resources, which negatively influenced their capacity to serve as mentors.

conclusionsMany factors, ranging from individual to institutional, influence mentorship for both faculty and students, which in turn influence international experiences. The underlying role of institutional support emerged as a highly salient influencing factor. Global health programs should harness the faculty and students' motivations and expectations, as well as provide better support to faculty serving as mentors.

Indexed as

Faculty, MedicalMentorsAttitude of Health PersonnelFocus GroupsGlobal HealthHumansMentoringMotivationProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchStudents, MedicalTraining SupportUnited StatesUniversities

Identifiers

PMID30896128
PMCPMC6634466
OpenAlexW2921591980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.