ArticleAnnals of global health2019
Building Blocks of Global Health Mentorship: Motivation, Expectations, and Institutional Support.
Article in Annals of global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Menteeship as power: Global health must Rethink how it grows its leaders.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Clinical Supervision of Medical Students in Primary Health Care Services: General Practitioners' Perspectives in Morocco.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2024Article
- Supporting early-career women researchers: lessons from a global mentorship programme.Global health action · 2023Article
- Lessons learnt from a nationally funded training and mentoring programme for early-mid career musculoskeletal researchers in Australia.Musculoskeletal care · 2023Article
- Global Health Mentorship: Challenges and Opportunities for Equitable Partnership.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Connectedness Is Critical: A Social Network Analysis to Support Emerging Women Leaders in Global Health.Annals of global health · 2022Article
- Mental Health and Work-Related Behaviors in Management of Work Requirements of University Lecturers in Ukraine-An Age Group Comparison.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Building Capacity for Global Cancer Research: Existing Opportunities and Future Directions.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Article
- Supporting early-career mentorship for women in Health Policy and Systems Research: a vital input to building the field.Health policy and planning · 2020Article
- Championing women working in health across regional and rural Australia - a new dual-mentorship model.BMC medical education · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal health education and training experiences are in high demand. Mentorship plays an important role in successful training, but academic institutions often lack formalized mentorship support. This study aimed to evaluate perceptions of global health mentorship across disciplines at Johns Hopkins University and to understand how to better support faculty mentorship for global health training.
methodsThis is a retrospective study that used qualitative methods to assess the perceptions of students who participated in the Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health (CGH) field placement program from 2011-2013 and CGH faculty who may have served as their mentors. Qualitative data was gathered through 30 individual in-depth interviews and 4 focus groups capturing both faculty and student perspectives. Data were analyzed inductively until thematic saturation was reached; a theoretical model, which we call the "building blocks of global health mentorship" model, emerged to serve as an analytical and synthesizing framework.
findingsA series of factors influenced global health mentorship from an individual to institutional level, including motivation, expectation alignment, finances, time, and knowledge. Both students and faculty reported the importance of motivation and aligned expectations to the mentorship experience and, more broadly, the overseas experience. Mentorship relationships were identified by students and faculty as either a catalyst or a hindrance to the training experience from both a personal and a professional point of view. Many faculty mentioned insufficient institutional support and financial resources, which negatively influenced their capacity to serve as mentors.
conclusionsMany factors, ranging from individual to institutional, influence mentorship for both faculty and students, which in turn influence international experiences. The underlying role of institutional support emerged as a highly salient influencing factor. Global health programs should harness the faculty and students' motivations and expectations, as well as provide better support to faculty serving as mentors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.