Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30895753›Full record

ArticleEthics & human research2019

Anticipatory Waivers of Consent for Pediatric Biobanking.

Jane A Hartsock, Peter H Schwartz, Amy C Waltz, Mary A Ott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethics & human research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jane A HartsockFaculty investigator with the Indiana University Center for Bioethics at the Indiana University School of Medicine and the director of clinical ethics for the Academic Health Center at Indiana University Health.
Peter H SchwartzDirector of the Indiana University Center for Bioethics at the Indiana University School of Medicine and an associate professor of medicine at Indiana University School of Medicine.
Amy C WaltzAssociate director of the Indiana University Human Subjects Office and an adjunct professor at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law.
Mary A OttPediatric ethicist at the Indiana University Center for Bioethics at the Indiana University School of Medicine and an associate professor of pediatrics in the Indiana University School of Medicine.

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
INDIANA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025761 · NCRR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2008 to 2011
$21.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As pediatric biobank research grows, additional guidance will be needed about whether researchers should always obtain consent from participants when they reach the legal age of majority. Biobanks struggle with a range of practical and ethical issues related to this question. We propose a framework for the use of anticipatory waivers of consent that is empirically rooted in research that shows that children and adolescents are often developmentally capable of meaningful deliberation about the risks and benefits of participation in research. Accordingly, bright-line legal concepts of majority or competency do not accurately capture the emerging capacity for autonomous decision-making of many pediatric research participants and unnecessarily complicate the issues about contacting participants at the age of majority to obtain consent for the continued or first use of their biospecimens that were obtained during childhood. We believe the proposed framework provides an ethically sound balance between the concern for potential exploitation of vulnerable populations, the impetus for the federal regulations governing research with children, and the need to conduct valuable research in the age of genomic medicine.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiological Specimen BanksChildDecision MakingFemaleHumansInformed ConsentInformed Consent By MinorsMaleMental CompetencyPediatricsVulnerable Populationsadolescentsbiobankingcapacityinformed consentinstitutional review boardpediatrics

Identifiers

PMID30895753
PMCPMC7370310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.