Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30895731›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2019

In vitro cellular viability studies on a concentrated surfactant-based wound dressing.

Rui Chen, Anne-Marie Salisbury, Steven L Percival

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04880655 (A Randomized, Controlled Study Evaluating a Surfactant-based Wound Dressing for Tissue Salvage and Reduction in Surgical Burden), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04880655 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Controlled Study Evaluating a Surfactant-based Wound Dressing for Tissue Salvage and Reduction in Surgical Burden

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TennesseeRan2021 to 2023Enrolled27ConditionsBurns, Partial-thickness BurnArmsWSD, Dressed with bacitracin and petrolatum gauze
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sulfated galactans fromiScience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. An IntactJournal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rui ChenCentre of Excellence for Biofilm Science (CEBS), 5D Health Protection Group Ltd., Liverpool Bio-Innovation Hub, Liverpool, UK.
Anne-Marie SalisburyCentre of Excellence for Biofilm Science (CEBS), 5D Health Protection Group Ltd., Liverpool Bio-Innovation Hub, Liverpool, UK.
Steven L PercivalCentre of Excellence for Biofilm Science (CEBS), 5D Health Protection Group Ltd., Liverpool Bio-Innovation Hub, Liverpool, UK.
Liverpool City Council · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, three cellular cytotoxic assays (direct contact assay, extraction assay, and cell insert assay) were applied to evaluate the effects of a concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials and a concentrated surfactant gel with 1% silver sulfadiazine on both the mouse fibroblast cell line L929 and human dermal fibroblasts (HDFa). Also, the in vitro wound model was wounded by a 100 μL pipette tip and used to assess cell migration and wound closure after treatment with both gels. A needle-scratched membrane disruption model was used to preliminarily evaluate membrane stabilisation and the membrane-resealing effects of concentrated surfactant gels. It was demonstrated that the concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials was not toxic to both L929 and HDFa. However, the concentrated surfactant gel with 1% silver sulfadiazine demonstrated a degree of cytotoxicity to both cell types. After treatment with a concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials, cell movement to close the scratch gap was enhanced at 24 and 48 hours. The results also showed that cells treated with the concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials decreased cell necrosis and improved cell resistance of the f-actin rearrangement after a needle scratch. The results demonstrated that a concentrated surfactant gel preserved with antimicrobials is non-cytotoxic and has ability to accelerate wound closure by enhancing cell mobility. Furthermore, the concentrated surfactant gel appeared to stabilise the plasma membrane and demonstrated a resealing ability and helped to retain the plasma membrane integrity and enhanced wound healing.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBandagesCells, CulturedCell SurvivalHumansIn Vitro TechniquesSilver SulfadiazineSurface-Active AgentsWound HealingWound InfectionAnti-Infective AgentsSilver SulfadiazineSurface-Active Agentscell membrane stabilisation and resealingcytotoxicitysurfactantwound closurewound dressing

Identifiers

PMID30895731
PMCPMC7948640
OpenAlexW2924817983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.