Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30895600›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2019

Postacute care outcomes and medicare payments for patients treated by physicians and advanced practitioners who specialize in nursing home practice.

Kira L Ryskina, Yihao Yuan, Rachel M Werner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reimagining Medical Care in Assisted Living.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2022
    Article
  15. Growth of Physicians and Nurse Practitioners Practicing Full Time in Nursing Homes.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. The Characteristics of Physicians Who Primarily Practice in Nursing Homes.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kira L RyskinaDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-3379-6394
Yihao YuanDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Rachel M WernerDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-3435-4221

Funding

Midcareer Mentoring Award for Patient-Oriented Research in AgingK24AG047908 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WERNER, RACHEL M · 2014 to 2024
$2.0M
UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF PHYSICIAN INTEGRATION WITHIN NURSING HOMES IN POST-ACUTE CARE OUTCOMESK08AG052572 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RYSKINA, KIRA L · 2016 to 2020
$821k
NIA NIH HHS K08 AG052572NIA NIH HHS K08-AG052572NIA NIH HHS K24 AG047908NIA NIH HHS K24-AG047908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo measure the association between clinician specialization in nursing home (NH) practice and outcomes of patients who received postacute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). DATA SOURCES: Medicare claims and NH assessments for 2 118 941 hospital discharges to 14 526 SNFs in January 2012-October 2014 and MD-PPAS data for 52 379 clinicians. STUDY

designGeneralist physicians and advanced practitioners with ≥ 90 percent of claims for NH-based care were considered NH specialists. The primary clinician during each SNF stay was determined based on plurality of claims during that stay. We estimated the effect of being treated by a NH specialist on 30-day rehospitalizations, successful discharge to community, and 60-day episode-of-care Medicare payments (Parts A and B). All models included patient demographics, clinical variables, and SNF fixed effects. PRINCIPAL

findingsNursing home specialists' patients were less likely to be rehospitalized (14.71 percent vs 16.23 percent; adjusted difference, -1.51 percent, 95% CI -1.78 to -1.24), more likely to be successfully discharged to community (56.33 percent vs 55.49 percent; adjusted difference, 0.84 percent, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.14), but had higher 60-day Medicare payments ($31 628 vs $31 292; adjusted difference, $335; 95% CI $242 to $429).

conclusionsClinicians who specialize in NH practice may achieve better postacute care outcomes at slightly higher costs.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansMaleMedicareNursing HomesPatient AcuityPatient ReadmissionPhysiciansSkilled Nursing FacilitiesSocioeconomic FactorsSpecializationSubacute CareUnited Statescare qualityhospitalizationnursing homepostacute carespecialization

Identifiers

PMID30895600
PMCPMC6505420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.