Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30895509›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2019

Diagnostic Value of C-Reactive Protein Levels in Postoperative Infectious Complications After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yung Lee, Tyler McKechnie, Aristithes G Doumouras, Chovav Handler, Cagla Eskicioglu, Scott Gmora, Mehran Anvari, Dennis Hong

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. C-reactive protein and digestive pathologies: A narrative review for daily clinical use.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yung LeeMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Tyler McKechnieMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Aristithes G DoumourasDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Chovav HandlerDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada.
Cagla EskiciogluDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Scott GmoraDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Mehran AnvariDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Dennis HongDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. dennishong70@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1792-1255
St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBariatric surgery involves the risk of postoperative infectious complications, in particular, anastomotic leaks and intra-abdominal abscesses. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a nonspecific marker of inflammation which has gained attention as a test to predict postoperative infectious complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic value of CRP to detect postoperative infectious complications after bariatric surgery.

methodsSearch of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PubMed databases were performed. Articles measuring serum CRP postoperatively in patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery were included. Main outcomes included diagnostic value of postoperative serum CRP (area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV)). Diagnostic accuracy of included studies was assessed using QUADAS-2.

resultsSix studies including 2770 patients met the inclusion criteria. The derived CRP cutoff values were 71.4 mg/dL, 130.3 mg/dL, and 118.7 mg/dL on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, and 5, respectively. Pooled AUC was similar across PODs 1, 3, and 5 with AUC being highest on POD 5 (0.88 ± 0.07). PPV was between 19 and 21%, and NPV was between 98 and 99%. CRP levels were significantly higher (P < .0001) in postoperative infectious complication group versus the no complication group on PODs 3 and 5.

conclusionsHigh NPV and moderately high sensitivity on PODs 1, 3, and 5 may help predict patients who are at a low risk of infectious complication following bariatric surgery. High specificity on PODs 1 and 3 also indicates that it can be useful for early diagnosis of postoperative infectious complications.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnastomotic LeakBariatric SurgeryBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansInfectionsMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodPredictive Value of TestsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinAnastomotic leakBariatric surgeryC-reactivePostoperative infectious complicationProtein

Identifiers

PMID30895509
OpenAlexW2924010847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.