Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30895359›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2019

Erectile dysfunction: a global review of intracavernosal injectables.

Catriona Duncan, Ghadir J Omran, Jiasian Teh, Niall F Davis, Damien M Bolton, Nathan Lawrentschuk

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pharmacological treatments of COVID-19.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2020
    Review
  12. Emerging Therapeutic Modalities against COVID-19.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  13. Topic issue: men's health in 2019.World journal of urology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Catriona DuncanDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Ghadir J OmranDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Jiasian TehDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Niall F DavisDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Damien M BoltonDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Nathan LawrentschukDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia. lawrentschuk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8553-5618
Austin Health · AUClinical Research Organization · BDAustin Hospital · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeData assessing the effectiveness of intracavernosal injections (ICIs) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) are limited. This study evaluates intracavernosal injectable therapies for ED and reviews available guidelines that inform clinical practice.

methodsA systematic search using electronic databases (Medline, Pubmed) was performed for studies investigating injectable management strategies for ED published after 1990. Primary outcome measures were to comparatively evaluate clinical efficacy, continuation rates and adverse event profiles of each injectable agent as monotherapy or in combination. The secondary outcome measurement was to discuss available guidelines that inform clinical practice for injectable agents.

resultsICIs demonstrate clinical efficacy in 54-100% of patients, early discontinuation rates of ≤ 38% and adverse events in ≤ 26%. Discontinuation rates are typically greatest within 3-6 months of commencement. Anxiety related to the initial injection occurs in approximately 65% and anxiety levels can remain high for 4 months. Approval of intracavernosal injection agents is mainly limited to alprostadil with the recent addition of aviptadil/phentolamine combination therapy in a select few geographical regions. Although combination therapies are attractive alternative options, their formulations are variable and should be standardised before widespread acceptance is achieved.

conclusionsICIs are associated with good clinical efficacy rates, high discontinuation rates and a moderate side-effect profile. They represent an important tool in the urological armamentarium for treating ED in patients that cannot tolerate or are refractory to oral therapies.

Indexed as

AlprostadilDrug CombinationsErectile DysfunctionHumansInjections, IntralesionalMalePenisPhentolamineVasoactive Intestinal PeptideVasodilator AgentsAlprostadilaviptadilDrug CombinationsPhentolamineVasoactive Intestinal PeptideVasodilator AgentsErectile dysfunction (ED)Intracavernosal injectionsTreatment of EDTreatment of erectile dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID30895359
OpenAlexW2923713811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.