ReviewDer Internist2019
[Immunoglobulin A nephropathy].
Review in Der Internist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying functional subtypes of IgA nephropathy based on three machine learning algorithms and WGCNA.BMC medical genomics · 2024Article
- Bibliometric analysis of mucosal immunity in IgA nephropathy from 1990 to 2022.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024Article
- Immunosuppressants or corticosteroids compared with supportive therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety for IgA nephropathy treatment.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- The contribution of theAmerican journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most prevalent primary form of glomerulopathy in the western world. The pathogenetic relevance of autoimmune mechanisms, genetics and environmental or nutritional factors is not fully established. The majority of IgAN patients present with mild symptoms; however, the exact prognosis of the individual IgAN course is often difficult to predict. In approximately one third of the patients the disease remains on a stable benign course, whereas approximately 30% may develop end-stage renal disease. Risk factors for disease progression are a persistent microhematuria and proteinuria >1 g/day, arterial hypertension and the extent of tubulointerstitial fibrosis at the time of diagnosis. Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified numerous risk alleles, which can contribute to the pathophysiology of IgAN. The so-called gut-kidney axis as well as the complement system and genes that are linked to mucosal immunity appear to be important for the manifestation of the disease. Intensive supportive care should be initiated as first-line treatment and only rare cases with progressive features require treatment with corticosteroids. Other immunosuppressive treatment strategies have currently no indications for IgAN. Future approaches might be the use of local budesonide or the inhibition of lymphocyte activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.