ReviewDer Pathologe2019
Urachal cancer-current concepts of a rare cancer.
Review in Der Pathologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Dublin International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Best Practice Recommendations on the Pathology of Urachal Neoplasms.The American journal of surgical pathology · 2025Guideline
- Treatment outcomes and next-generation sequencing of a rare malignancy - urachal carcinoma: case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Cardiac metastasis mimicking acute myocardial infarction in a patient with urachal carcinoma: a case report and diagnostic dilemma.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- A case-based review of urachal carcinoma with mixed small cell neuroendocrine and adenocarcinoma components, with one new case report and analysis of nine published cases.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Urachal adenocarcinoma in an adolescent boy: a case report.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Rare case of enteric type of urachal adenocarcinoma: A case report.Urology case reports · 2024Article
- Acute Glomerulonephritis as a Paraneoplastic Syndrome Secondary to Urachal Adenocarcinoma: An Unknown Entity.Cureus · 2024Article
- Regular gastroscopy and colonoscopy during the evaluation of urachal cancer: do we really need them?BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Originating From Urachal Carcinoma: Case Reports and Review of the Literature.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2023Review
- Urachus adenocarcinoma mistaken for umbilical incision implant cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case report.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2023Article
- An Unusual Case of Urachal Cyst Misdiagnosed as a Paraovarian Cyst: Ultrasound Assessment and Differential Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Bladder mucinous adenocarcinoma as a diagnostic challenge: a case report.The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- Primary urachal signet ring cell carcinoma: A case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- A new technological approach in diagnostic pathology: mass spectrometry imaging-based metabolomics for biomarker detection in urachal cancer.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2021Article
- Clinical Utility ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Current Understanding of Urachal Adenocarcinoma and Management Strategy.Current oncology reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urachal cancer is a rare but aggressive disease. In addition to the non-glandular tumors, non-cystic urachal adenocarcinomas are nowadays distinguished from the primary cystic variant. (Immunohistochemical) markers are only of minor differential diagnostic value and, therefore, the diagnosis is primarily established in a multidisciplinary approach. The non-cystic variant accounts for the majority of cases (83%), is more common in men (63%), shows a median age at diagnosis of 51 years and has a 5-year survival rate of about 50%. In organ-confined disease, usually a partial cystectomy of the tumor in the bladder dome, including the median umbilical ligament and umbilicus, is performed. In advanced stages, systemic therapy is needed while 5‑fuorouracil (5-FU) containing regimes have been shown to be more effective. Due to the rarity of the tumor, targeted therapy approaches based on a biological rationale are becoming increasingly relevant. As molecular data are still sparse, we compiled and analyzed the largest urachal cancer cohort to date. In 31% of the cases, MAPK-/PI3K signaling pathway alterations were detected (especially in K-/NRAS) with implications for anti-EGFR therapy approaches. Further potentially therapeutic alterations were detected in FGFR1, MET, PDGFRA, and erbB2/HER2. Additionally, PD-L1 tumor cell expression (clone: 22C3) was demonstrated in 16% of cases, therefore making anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immuno-oncological approaches worth considering despite the absence of mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-d) and/or high microsatellite instability (MSI-h). Finally, urachal adenocarcinomas seem to be a distinct entity on the molecular level with closer resemblance to colorectal adenocarcinomas than to urothelial carcinomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30895340What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.