Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30895292›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2019

Dissecting the Pre-Columbian Genomic Ancestry of Native Americans along the Andes-Amazonia Divide.

Guido Alberto Gnecchi-Ruscone, Stefania Sarno, Sara De Fanti, Laura Gianvincenzo, Cristina Giuliani, Alessio Boattini, Eugenio Bortolini, Tullia Di Corcia, Cesar Sanchez Mellado, Taylor Jesus Dàvila Francia and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A genomic perspective on South American human history.Genetics and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Guido Alberto Gnecchi-RusconeLaboratory of Molecular Anthropology and Centre for Genome Biology, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Stefania SarnoLaboratory of Molecular Anthropology and Centre for Genome Biology, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sara De FantiLaboratory of Molecular Anthropology and Centre for Genome Biology, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Laura GianvincenzoLaboratory of Molecular Anthropology and Centre for Genome Biology, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Cristina GiulianiLaboratory of Molecular Anthropology and Centre for Genome Biology, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alessio BoattiniLaboratory of Molecular Anthropology and Centre for Genome Biology, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Eugenio BortoliniDepartment of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Ravenna, Italy.
Tullia Di CorciaDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Cesar Sanchez MelladoFaculty of Intercultural Education and Humanity, National Intercultural University of Amazon, Ucayali, Peru.
Taylor Jesus Dàvila FranciaFaculty of Intercultural Education and Humanity, National Intercultural University of Amazon, Ucayali, Peru.
Davide GentiliniCenter for Biomedical Research and Technologies, Italian Auxologic Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Anna Maria Di BlasioCenter for Biomedical Research and Technologies, Italian Auxologic Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Patrizia Di CosimoTakesi Project, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Elisabetta CilliDepartment of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Ravenna, Italy.
Antonio Gonzalez-MartinDepartment of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Claudio FranceschiDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Zelda Alice FranceschiDepartment of History and Cultures, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Olga RickardsDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Marco SazziniLaboratory of Molecular Anthropology and Centre for Genome Biology, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Donata LuiselliDepartment of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Ravenna, Italy.
Davide PettenerLaboratory of Molecular Anthropology and Centre for Genome Biology, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive European and African admixture coupled with loss of Amerindian lineages makes the reconstruction of pre-Columbian history of Native Americans based on present-day genomes extremely challenging. Still open questions remain about the dispersals that occurred throughout the continent after the initial peopling from the Beringia, especially concerning the number and dynamics of diffusions into South America. Indeed, if environmental and historical factors contributed to shape distinct gene pools in the Andes and Amazonia, the origins of this East-West genetic structure and the extension of further interactions between populations residing along this divide are still not well understood. To this end, we generated new high-resolution genome-wide data for 229 individuals representative of one Central and ten South Amerindian ethnic groups from Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina. Low levels of European and African admixture in the sampled individuals allowed the application of fine-scale haplotype-based methods and demographic modeling approaches. These analyses revealed highly specific Native American genetic ancestries and great intragroup homogeneity, along with limited traces of gene flow mainly from the Andes into Peruvian Amazonians. Substantial amount of genetic drift differentially experienced by the considered populations underlined distinct patterns of recent inbreeding or prolonged isolation. Overall, our results support the hypothesis that all non-Andean South Americans are compatible with descending from a common lineage, while we found low support for common Mesoamerican ancestors of both Andeans and other South American groups. These findings suggest extensive back-migrations into Central America from non-Andean sources or conceal distinct peopling events into the Southern Continent.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanHuman MigrationGene FlowGenetic VariationHaplotypesHumansIndians, South AmericanModels, GeneticPhylogeographyPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisSouth AmericaAmazoniaAndesgenome-wide SNPsNative American ancestrypopulation genomics

Identifiers

PMID30895292
PMCPMC6526910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.