Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30895268›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2019

A randomized controlled trial of AMH-based individualized FSH dosing in a GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF.

J Friis Petersen, E Løkkegaard, L F Andersen, K Torp, A Egeberg, L Hedegaard, D Nysom, A Nyboe Andersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anti-Müllerian Hormone and Ovarian Reserve: Update on Assessing Ovarian Function.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Friis PetersenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Zealand Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, Hilleroed, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5619-1809
E LøkkegaardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Zealand Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, Hilleroed, Denmark.
L F AndersenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Zealand Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, Hilleroed, Denmark.
K TorpDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Zealand Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, Hilleroed, Denmark.
A EgebergThe Fertility Clinic 4071, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark.
L HedegaardThe Fertility Clinic 4071, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark.
D NysomThe Fertility Clinic 4071, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark.
A Nyboe AndersenThe Fertility Clinic 4071, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rigshospitalet · DKZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDoes an individualized serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) based FSH dosing algorithm used in a GnRH antagonist protocol increase the proportion of patients with an intended number of oocytes (5-14) retrieved compared with a standard regimen? SUMMARY ANSWER: The AMH-based individualized algorithm did not increase the proportion of patients with an intended oocyte retrieval. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Individualizing treatment for ovarian stimulation by serum AMH or antral follicle count can theoretically improve the ratio between benefits and risks. Current data suggest that there may be a reduced risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), but without improved pregnancy or live birth rates. Only two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the potential of AMH-based algorithms to optimize the FSH dosing in ovarian stimulation. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A dual-center open-label investigator-driven RCT was conducted between January 2013 and November 2016. Eligibility was assessed in 269 women and 221 were randomized 2:1 between individualized and standard dosing groups. Women with pretreatment serum AMH > 24 pmol/L had 100 IU/day of recombinant FSH (rFSH); AMH 12-24 pmol/L had 150 IU/day of rFSH, and AMH < 12 pmol/L had maximal stimulation with corifollitropin 100 or 150 mg depending on bodyweight ±60 kg. The standard group had 150 IU/day of rFSH irrespective of pretreatment AMH. All patients followed the GnRH-antagonist protocol.The sample size calculation assumed that individualized dosing by AMH would reduce the proportion of unintended oocyte yield (outside the 5-14 range) by 50%, from 35 to 17.5%. In a 2:1 randomization this required 216 patients: 144 in the individualized and 72 patients in the standard group (80% power, 5% significance). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsAll women had a presumed ovulatory normal menstrual cycle, were aged 25-38 years, weighed < 75 kg, had pretreatment AMH 4-40 pmol/L, did their first IVF or ICSI cycle and had two ovaries accessible to oocyte retrieval. Recruitment was conducted from both participating sites. Women were excluded if diagnosed with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis grade III/IV, hydrosalpings on ultrasound, recurrent miscarriages (≥3), FSH > 12 IU/L or major medical disorders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: After randomization 149 women were allocated to the individualized group and 72 to the standard group. The primary outcome of women with an intended (5-14) number of oocytes retrieved was similar in the individualized ( LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study was powered for showing differences only in the distribution of oocyte retrieval when comparing individualized and standard groups, therefore additional results should be viewed with caution. In addition, there was a change of AMH assay halfway through the study period and the possibility that corifollitropin being introduced to a subgroup of the intervention has introduced confounding cannot be ruled out. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF

findingsIn the expected high responder AMH stratum, 100 IU/day is an insufficient rFSH dose in a high proportion of patients. Further research might explore the 125 IU/day dose for the high AMH segment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None for the submitted work. ICMJE declared personal interests for two of the authors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUDRACT registration number: 2012-004969-40. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 27 November 2012. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLLMENT: 10 January 2013.

Indexed as

anti-Müllerian hormoneFSHindividualized FSH dosingoocyte retrievalovarian responseovarian stimulationrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID30895268
PMCPMC6396645
OpenAlexW2916048107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.