ArticleHuman reproduction open2017
Effects of maternal smoking on offspring reproductive outcomes: an intergenerational study in the North East of Scotland.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fetal loss in women exposed to cigarette smoke in-utero.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Tobacco exposure and risk of spontaneous abortion, a dose-dependent association: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Tobacco induced diseases · 2025Article
- The Impact of Early-Life Exposures on Women's Reproductive Health in Adulthood.Current epidemiology reports · 2021Review
- Recalled maternal lifestyle behaviors associated with anti-müllerian hormone of adult female offspring.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Testing the twin testosterone transfer hypothesis-intergenerational analysis of 317 dizygotic twins born in Aberdeen, Scotland.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Maternal smoking and high BMI disrupt thyroid gland development.BMC medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
study questionHow does exposure to cigarette smoke SUMMARY ANSWER: Women exposed to cigarette smoke WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Existing epidemiological studies have been inconsistent, but generally suggest a small decrease in fertility of women exposed to cigarette smoke STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This cohort study included all women born prior to 31st December 1972 as recorded in the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank. Exposure to maternal cigarette smoking PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsWithin the cohort, 3836 women were exposed to cigarette smoke and 8485 women were not exposed to cigarette smoke MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The study did not find a link between exposure to cigarette smoke LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although the cohort in this study was large, there were women for whom exposure data was unavailable. Data on the adult circumstances of women who did not record a pregnancy was unavailable, precluding adjustment for their own smoking status or social class. In addition, women who migrated from the area or chose childlessness voluntarily were not included in the study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsDespite the wide-ranging harmful effects of cigarette smoke on foetal reproductive development, the effect at a population level remains uncertain. An increased risk of miscarriage in women exposed to cigarette smoke is a potentially important novel finding, which should be investigated further. This study illustrates the lack of consensus on the reproductive effects of STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No funding received. No competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.