Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30895221›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction open2017

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation: clinical and research perspectives.

Richard A Anderson, W Hamish B Wallace, Evelyn E Telfer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation in girls and adolescents at risk of gonadotoxicity: a 15-year experience in 159 patients from a referral program.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Richard A AndersonMedical Research Council, Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, EdinburghEH16 4TJ, UK.
W Hamish B WallaceDepartment of Haematology/Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, 9 Sciennes Rd, Edinburgh EH9 1LF, UK.
Evelyn E TelferInstitute of Cell Biology and Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Hugh Robson Building, George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, UK.
Medical Research Council · GBRoyal Hospital for Children · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901839Medical Research Council G1002118Medical Research Council G1100357Medical Research Council MR/L00299X/1Medical Research Council MR/N022556/1Medical Research Council MR/R003246/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall case series have reported successful live births after ovarian tissue cryopreservation and orthotopic transplantation, demonstrating that it can be of value in increasing the chance of successful pregnancy after treatment for cancer and other fertility-impacting diseases in adult women. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This review is intended to set out the current clinical issues in the field of ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and elucidate the status of laboratory studies to address these. SEARCH

methodsWe reviewed the English-language literature on ovarian tissue cryopreservation and in vitro maturation (IVM) of ovarian follicles. OUTCOMES: Ovarian tissue cryopreservation is increasingly used for fertility preservation and, whilst areas for development remain (optimal patient selection, minimizing risk of contamination by malignant cells and IVM protocols), there are emerging data as to its efficacy. We review the current status of ovarian tissue cryopreservation in girls and young women facing loss of fertility from treatment of cancer and other serious diseases. Increasingly large cohort studies are reporting on success rates from ovarian tissue cryopreservation giving an indication of likely success rates. Patient selection is necessary to ensure the safety and effectiveness of this approach, especially in the very experimental situation of its application to prepubertal girls. There are continuing developments in supporting follicle development LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The evidence base consists largely of case series and cohort studies, thus there is the possibility of bias in key outcomes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsOvarian tissue cryopreservation is becoming established as a valuable approach to the preservation of fertility in women. Its application in prepubertal girls may be of particular value, as it offers the only approach in this patient group. For both girls and young women, more accurate data are needed on the likelihood of successful childbirth after this procedure and the factors that underpin successful application of this approach, which will lead to its more effective use. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The author's work in this field is supported by Medical Research Grant (MRC) grants G0901839 and MR/L00299X/1 and partially undertaken in the MRC Centre for Reproductive Health which is funded by MRC Centre grant MR/N022556/1. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could prejudice the impartiality of the present research.

Indexed as

cryopreservationfertility preservationgonadotoxicityivm: artificial ovarytissue culture

Identifiers

PMID30895221
PMCPMC6276668
OpenAlexW2602356529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.