Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30895202›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2019

Prevalence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor Resistance in British Columbia, Canada Between 2009 and 2016: A Longitudinal Analysis.

Kimia Kamelian, Katherine J Lepik, William Chau, Benita Yip, Wendy W Zhang, Viviane Dias Lima, Marjorie A Robbins, Conan Woods, Andrea Olmstead, Jeffrey B Joy and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kimia KamelianBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3465-1285
Katherine J LepikBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
William ChauBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Benita YipBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Wendy W ZhangBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Viviane Dias LimaBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Marjorie A RobbinsBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Conan WoodsBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Andrea OlmsteadBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jeffrey B JoyBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Rolando BarriosBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
P Richard HarriganUniversity of British Columbia, Department of Medicine, Division of AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are highly efficacious and well tolerated antiretrovirals with fewer adverse side-effects relative to other classes of antiretrovirals. The use of INSTIs raltegravir, elvitegravir, and dolutegravir has increased dramatically over recent years. However, there is limited information about the evolution and prevalence of INSTI resistance mutations in clinical human immunodeficiency virus populations.

methodsHuman immunodeficiency virus-1-positive individuals ≥19 years were included if they received ≥1 dispensed prescription of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in British Columbia between 2009 and 2016 (N = 9358). Physician-ordered drug resistance tests were analyzed and protease inhibitor (PI), reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (RT), and INSTI resistance were defined as having ≥1 sample with a combined, cumulative score ≥30 by Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Algorithm version 7.0.1.

resultsAlthough most ART-treated individuals were tested for PI and RT resistance, INSTI resistance testing lagged behind the uptake of INSTIs among INSTI-treated individuals (11% in 2009; 34% in 2016). The prevalence of INSTI resistance was relatively low, but it increased from 1 to 7 per 1000 ART-treated individuals between 2009 and 2016 (

conclusionsThe prevalence of INSTI resistance remains low compared with PI and RT resistance in ART-treated populations but is expanding with increased INSTI use.

Indexed as

dolutegravirdrug resistanceelvitegravirHIV integrase strand transfer inhibitorraltegravir

Identifiers

PMID30895202
PMCPMC6419991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.