Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30895198›Full record

ArticleBrain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England)2018

Effects of simulated visual acuity and ocular motility impairments on SSVEP brain-computer interface performance: An experiment with Shuffle Speller.

Betts Peters, Matt Higger, Fernando Quivira, Steven Bedrick, Shiran Dudy, Brandon Eddy, Michelle Kinsella, Tab Memmott, Jack Wiedrick, Melanie Fried-Oken and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Personalized Brain-Computer Interface and Its Applications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
  3. Human visual skills for brain-computer interface use: a tutorial.Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Betts PetersInstitute on Development & Disability, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Matt HiggerPsychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Fernando QuiviraElectrical & Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
Steven BedrickCenter for Spoken Language Understanding, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Shiran DudyCenter for Spoken Language Understanding, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Brandon EddyInstitute on Development & Disability, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Michelle KinsellaInstitute on Development & Disability, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Tab MemmottDepartments of Neurology, Behavioral Neuroscience, and Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Jack WiedrickBiostatistics & Design Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Melanie Fried-OkenInstitute on Development & Disability, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Deniz ErdogmusElectrical & Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
Barry OkenDepartments of Neurology, Behavioral Neuroscience, and Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Funding

Translational refinement of adaptive communication system for locked-in patientsR01DC009834 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FRIED-OKEN, MELANIE · 2009 to 2024
$12.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with severe speech and physical impairments may have concomitant visual acuity impairments (VAI) or ocular motility impairments (OMI) impacting visual BCI use. We report on the use of the Shuffle Speller typing interface for an SSVEP BCI copy-spelling task under three conditions: simulated VAI, simulated OMI, and unimpaired vision. To mitigate the effect of visual impairments, we introduce a method that adaptively selects a user-specific trial length to maximize expected information transfer rate (ITR); expected ITR is shown to closely approximate the rate of correct letter selections. All participants could type under the unimpaired and simulated VAI conditions, with no significant differences in typing accuracy or speed. Most participants (31 of 37) could not type under the simulated OMI condition; some achieved high accuracy but with slower typing speeds. Reported workload and discomfort were low, and satisfaction high, under the unimpaired and simulated VAI conditions. Implications and future directions to examine effect of visual impairment on BCI use is discussed.

Indexed as

Brain-computer interfacescommunication aids for disabledevoked potentialseye movementslowvisionvision disordersvisual

Identifiers

PMID30895198
PMCPMC6422161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.