Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30895075›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental sciences2017

Clinical and pathologic features related to the impacted third molars in patients of different ages: A retrospective study in the Korean population.

Ji-Youn Kim, Hyeon-Gun Jee, Hyun Chul Song, Sun-Jong Kim, Myung-Rae Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mischievous mandibular third molars camouflaging temporomandibular joint disorders.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2022
    Article
  10. Third molar extraction in middle-aged and elderly patient.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ji-Youn KimDivision of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, South Korea.
Hyeon-Gun JeeCancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyun Chul SongDivision of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, South Korea.
Sun-Jong KimGraduate School of Clinical Implant Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Myung-Rae KimGraduate School of Clinical Implant Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Ewha Womans University · KRThe Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purposeThe surgical extraction of impacted third molars (ITMs) is a common surgical procedure in dentistry. If prophylactic removal of ITMs is beneficial, however, is a still disputed issue. The aim of this study was to analysis the pathologic changes in impacted third molars (ITMs) and adjacent teeth according to patient age groups in the Korean population to determine if the prophylactic removal of ITMs is to be supported or not. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective study of patients who underwent surgical extraction of impacted third molars was performed. The patients were divided into 5 groups according to their age. Each group was analyzed with respect to patients' chief complaints, specific pathologic conditions in ITMs, and the damage to adjacent teeth due to untreated ITMs.

resultsIn this study, 2883 impacted third molars in 1109 patients were analyzed. The most common patients' chief complaint was pain, and the frequency of pain was significantly higher in older age groups. The frequency and severity of pathologic changes in ITMs and adjacent second molars due to ITMs were increased with advancing age.

conclusionBased on the results of this study, we conclude that the prophylactic removal of ITMs that have a higher probability of pathologic changes can be considered to be a reasonable treatment modality in younger patients to reduce morbidity resulting from surgical extraction compared with patients who attained advanced age.

Indexed as

dental cariesextractionimpacted third molarperiodontal diseaseprophylactic removal

Identifiers

PMID30895075
PMCPMC6395358
OpenAlexW2625805908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.