Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30894867›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2019

Impact of Stomatal Density and Morphology on Water-Use Efficiency in a Changing World.

Lígia T Bertolino, Robert S Caine, Julie E Gray

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 219 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
219citing papers in PubMed
34.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

219 citing papers in PubMed, 665 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Identification of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Role of Root and Shoot Structures in CHPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Future heatwave conditions inhibit COThe New phytologist · 2026
    Article

159 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lígia T BertolinoGrantham Centre for Sustainable Futures, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Robert S CaineDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Julie E GrayDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global warming and associated precipitation changes will negatively impact on many agricultural ecosystems. Major food production areas are expected to experience reduced water availability and increased frequency of drought over the coming decades. In affected areas, this is expected to reduce the production of important food crops including wheat, rice, and maize. The development of crop varieties able to sustain or improve yields with less water input is, therefore, a priority for crop research. Almost all water used for plant growth is lost to the atmosphere by transpiration through stomatal pores on the leaf epidermis. By altering stomatal pore apertures, plants are able to optimize their CO

Indexed as

cropsdrought responsestomatal conductancestomatal density and sizewater-use efficiency

Identifiers

PMID30894867
PMCPMC6414756
OpenAlexW2921422770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.