Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30894701›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2019

ClinGen expert clinical validity curation of 164 hearing loss gene-disease pairs.

Marina T DiStefano, Sarah E Hemphill, Andrea M Oza, Rebecca K Siegert, Andrew R Grant, Madeline Y Hughes, Brandon J Cushman, Hela Azaiez, Kevin T Booth, Alex Chapin and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ClinGen recuration of hearing loss-associated genes demonstrates significant changes in gene-disease validity over time.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Extreme Phenotypic Variability ofAdvanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. In-Depth Genomic Analysis: The New Challenge in Congenital Heart Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Marina T DiStefanoLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sarah E HemphillLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Andrea M OzaLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Rebecca K SiegertThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Andrew R GrantThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Madeline Y HughesThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Brandon J CushmanLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Hela AzaiezMolecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Laboratories, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Kevin T BoothMolecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Laboratories, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Alex ChapinARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Hatice DuzkaleDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Tatsuo MatsunagaDivision of Hearing and Balance Research, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun ShenLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Wenying ZhangThe Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Margaret KennaDept. of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Lisa A SchimmentiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Clinical Genomics and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mustafa TekinJohn P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Heidi L RehmLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ahmad N Abou TayounAl Jalila Children's Specialty Hospital, Al Jaddaf, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Sami S AmrLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA. samr@partners.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0927-6057
ClinGen Hearing Loss Clinical Domain Working Group

Funding

Resource ProjectU41HG006834 · NHGRI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MARTIN, CHRISTA LESE, REHM, HEIDI L · 2013 to 2020
$26.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG006834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProper interpretation of genomic variants is critical to successful medical decision making based on genetic testing results. A fundamental prerequisite to accurate variant interpretation is the clear understanding of the clinical validity of gene-disease relationships. The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) has developed a semiquantitative framework to assign clinical validity to gene-disease relationships.

methodsThe ClinGen Hearing Loss Gene Curation Expert Panel (HL GCEP) uses this framework to perform evidence-based curations of genes present on testing panels from 17 clinical laboratories in the Genetic Testing Registry. The HL GCEP curated and reviewed 142 genes and 164 gene-disease pairs, including 105 nonsyndromic and 59 syndromic forms of hearing loss.

resultsThe final outcome included 82 Definitive (50%), 12 Strong (7%), 25 Moderate (15%), 32 Limited (20%), 10 Disputed (6%), and 3 Refuted (2%) classifications. The summary of each curation is date stamped with the HL GCEP approval, is live, and will be kept up-to-date on the ClinGen website ( https://search.clinicalgenome.org/kb/gene-validity ).

conclusionThis gene curation approach serves to optimize the clinical sensitivity of genetic testing while reducing the rate of uncertain or ambiguous test results caused by the interrogation of genes with insufficient evidence of a disease link.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticData CurationDeafnessGenetic TestingGenetic VariationGenome, HumanGenomicsHearing LossHumansMutationReproducibility of ResultsClinGendeafnessgene curationgenetic diagnosishearing loss

Identifiers

PMID30894701
PMCPMC7280024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.