Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30894692›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2019

Handheld laser devices and laser-induced retinopathy (LIR) in children: an overview of the literature.

James E Neffendorf, G Darius Hildebrand, Susan M Downes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Retinal injuries in seven teenage boys from the same handheld laser.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James E NeffendorfThe Oxford Eye Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
G Darius HildebrandThe Oxford Eye Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Susan M DownesThe Oxford Eye Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. susan.downes@ouh.nhs.uk.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Handheld laser devices are easily available to purchase through the internet and unregulated marketplaces at a relatively low cost. They are particularly attractive to children as they are seen as 'high tech', brightly coloured, and known to be able to burn holes in objects such as balloons. There is a widespread lack of knowledge about the risks of viewing the beam emanating directly from handheld lasers, and particularly those with high-output powers. The number of reported laser induced retinopathy (LIR) injuries in children is on the increase in the United Kingdom and represents a major public health issue. The number of individuals affected by LIR is likely to be underestimated owing to lack of presentation to health professionals, general poor awareness and non-reporting by children after the incident. The presentation of LIR is highly variable and dependent on many factors including type of laser, length of exposure and how it is administered. In this article, we review the features of retinal damage associated with inadvertent or deliberate laser administration using a handheld laser device. We highlight the importance of educating the wider public about this increasing problem; children who play with these devices are usually completely unaware of the long-term consequences of laser damage to the eye. It is also important that the features of LIR are recognised by health professionals involved in eye care as they can be mistaken for retinal dystrophies, particularly if the history of laser exposure is not volunteered or elicited.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityEye InjuriesHumansLasersPlay and PlaythingsRetinaRetinal DiseasesTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID30894692
PMCPMC7005768
OpenAlexW2924545454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.