Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30894618›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Repeat decompression and fusions following posterolateral fusion versus posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylosis: a national database study.

Moon Soo Park, Young-Su Ju, Seong-Hwan Moon, Tae-Hwan Kim, Jae Keun Oh, Jin Kyu Lim, Chi Heon Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Ho Guen Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Are the facet joint parameters risk factors for cage subsidence after TLIF in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Moon Soo ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Medical College of Hallym University, 22 Gwanpyeong-ro 170 beon-gi, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068, Republic of Korea. amhangpark@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2833-9148
Young-Su JuDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Medical College of Hallym University, 22 Gwanpyeong-ro 170 beon-gil, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Hwan MoonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Hwan KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Medical College of Hallym University, 22 Gwanpyeong-ro 170 beon-gi, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068, Republic of Korea.
Jae Keun OhDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Medical College of Hallym University, 22 Gwanpyeong-ro 170 beon-gi, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068, Republic of Korea.
Jin Kyu LimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Medical College of Hallym University, 150, Seongan-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 05355, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2819-1684
Chi Heon KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Chun Kee ChungDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3485-2327
Ho Guen ChangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Medical College of Hallym University, 22 Gwanpyeong-ro 170 beon-gi, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a low incidence of reoperation after surgery. It is difficult to detect statistical differences between reoperation rates of different lumbar fusion surgeries. National population-based databases provide large, longitudinally followed cohorts that may help overcome this challenge. The purpose is to compare the repeat decompression and fusion rate after surgery for degenerative lumbar diseases according to different surgical fusion procedures based on national population-based databases and elucidate the risk factor for repeat decompression and fusions. The Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database was used. Patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar diseases and who underwent single-level fusion surgeries between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2016, were included. They were divided into two groups based on procedure codes: posterolateral fusion or posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The primary endpoint was repeat decompression and fusion. Age, sex, the presence of diabetes, osteoporosis, associated comorbidities, and hospital types were considered potential confounding factors. The repeat decompression and fusion rate was not different between the patients who underwent posterolateral fusion and those who underwent posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Old age, male sex, and hospital type were noted to be risk factors. The incidence of repeat decompression and fusion was independent on the fusion method.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsDatabases, FactualDecompression, SurgicalFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID30894618
PMCPMC6426932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.