Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30894601›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Eco-physiological responses of copepods and pteropods to ocean warming and acidification.

J Engström-Öst, O Glippa, R A Feely, M Kanerva, J E Keister, S R Alin, B R Carter, A K McLaskey, K A Vuori, N Bednaršek

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

J Engström-ÖstNovia University of Applied Sciences, Ekenäs, Finland. jonna.engstrom-ost@novia.fi.
O GlippaNovia University of Applied Sciences, Ekenäs, Finland.
R A FeelyPacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA.
M KanervaEhime University, Center for Marine Environmental Studies, Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Matsuyama, Japan.
J E KeisterSchool of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
S R AlinPacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA.
B R CarterJoint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
A K McLaskeySchool of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
K A VuoriLaboratory of Animal Physiology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
N BednaršekSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, CA, 92626, USA.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · USNovia University of Applied Sciences · FISeattle University · USEhime University · JPSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project · USUniversity of Turku · FIUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compare physiological responses of the crustacean copepod Calanus pacificus and pelagic pteropod mollusk Limacina helicina to ocean temperatures and pH by measuring biomarkers of oxidative stress, antioxidant defences, and the activity of the respiratory electron transport system in organisms collected on the 2016 West Coast Ocean Acidification cruise in the California Current System. Copepods and pteropods exhibited strong but divergent responses in the same habitat; copepods had higher oxygen-reactive absorbance capacity, glutathione-S-transferase, and total glutathione content. The ratio between reduced to oxidised glutathione was higher in copepods than in pteropods, indicating lower oxidative stress in copepods. Pteropods showed higher activities of glutathione reductase, catalase, and lipid peroxidation, indicating increased antioxidant defences and oxidative stress. Thus, the antioxidant defence system of the copepods has a greater capacity to respond to oxidative stress, while pteropods already face severe stress and show limited capacity to deal with further changes. The results suggest that copepods have higher adaptive potential, owing to their stronger vertical migration behaviour and efficient glutathione metabolism, whereas pteropods run the risk of oxidative stress and mortality under high CO

Indexed as

Global WarmingHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAntioxidantsCopepodaElectron TransportGastropodaMolluscaOceans and SeasOxidative StressAntioxidants

Identifiers

PMID30894601
PMCPMC6426838
OpenAlexW2924886015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.