Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30894508›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2019

Comparison of human isogeneic Wharton's jelly MSCs and iPSC-derived MSCs reveals differentiation-dependent metabolic responses to IFNG stimulation.

Liani Devito, Michail E Klontzas, Aleksandra Cvoro, Antonio Galleu, Marisa Simon, Carl Hobbs, Francesco Dazzi, Athanasios Mantalaris, Yacoub Khalaf, Dusko Ilic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Liani DevitoDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Michail E KlontzasDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2731-933X
Aleksandra CvoroGenomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Antonio GalleuDepartment of Haemato-oncology, Rayne Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Marisa SimonGenomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Carl HobbsHistology Laboratory, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.
Francesco DazziDepartment of Haemato-oncology, Rayne Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Athanasios MantalarisDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Yacoub KhalafDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Dusko IlicDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK. dusko.ilic@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1647-0026
Guy's Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBHouston Methodist · USImperial College London · GBThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · US

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variability among donors, non-standardized methods for isolation, and characterization contribute to mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC) heterogeneity. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSCs)-derived MSCs would circumvent many of current issues and enable large-scale production of standardized cellular therapy. To explore differences between native MSCs (nMSCs) and iPSC-derived MSCs (iMSCs), we developed isogeneic lines from Wharton's jelly (WJ) from the umbilical cords of two donors (#12 and #13) under xeno-free conditions. Next, we reprogrammed them into iPSCs (iPSC12 and iPSC13) and subsequently differentiated them back into iMSCs (iMSC12 and iMSC13) using two different protocols, which we named ARG and TEX. We assessed their differentiation capability, transcriptome, immunomodulatory potential, and interferon-γ (IFNG)-induced changes in metabolome. Our data demonstrated that although both differentiation protocols yield iMSCs similar to their parental nMSCs, there are substantial differences. The ARG protocol resulted in iMSCs with a strong immunomodulatory potential and lower plasticity and proliferation rate, whereas the TEX protocol raised iMSCs with a higher proliferation rate, better differentiation potential, though weak immunomodulatory response. Our data suggest that, following a careful selection and screening of donors, nMSCs from umbilical's cord WJ can be easily reprogrammed into iPSCs, providing an unlimited source of material for differentiation into iMSCs. However, the differentiation protocol should be chosen depending on their clinical use.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell PlasticityCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingCellular Reprogramming TechniquesFemaleHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsInterferon-gammaMesenchymal Stem CellsMetabolomeTranscriptomeUmbilical CordIFNG protein, humanInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID30894508
PMCPMC6426992
OpenAlexW2923023737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.