Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30894292›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2019

Dynamics of Replication Fork Progression Following Helicase-Polymerase Uncoupling in Eukaryotes.

Martin R G Taylor, Joseph T P Yeeles

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin R G TaylorDivision of Protein and Nucleic Acid Chemistry, Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK.
Joseph T P YeelesDivision of Protein and Nucleic Acid Chemistry, Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK. Electronic address: jyeeles@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_1201/12Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 110014/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leading-strand polymerase stalling at DNA damage impairs replication fork progression. Using biochemical approaches, we show this arises due to both slower template unwinding following helicase-polymerase uncoupling and establishment of prolonged stalled fork structures. Fork slowing and stalling occur at structurally distinct lesions, are always associated with continued lagging-strand synthesis, are observed when either Pol ε or Pol δ stalls at leading-strand damage, and do not require specific helicase-polymerase coupling factors. Hence, the key trigger for these replisome-intrinsic responses is cessation of leading-strand polymerization, revealing this as a crucial driver of normal replication fork rates. We propose that this helps balance the need for sufficient uncoupling to activate the DNA replication checkpoint with excessive destabilizing single-stranded DNA exposure in eukaryotes.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationDNA DamageDNA HelicasesDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase IIIDNA RepairSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNA HelicasesDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase IIISaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNA damage responseDNA repairDNA replicationreplication forkstalled fork

Identifiers

PMID30894292
PMCPMC6525111
OpenAlexW2922261746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.