Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30894285›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology2019

Chance or choice? Understanding parasite selection and infection in multi-host communities.

Pieter T J Johnson, Dana M Calhoun, Tawni B Riepe, Janet Koprivnikar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Mixed-species assemblages and disease: the importance of differential vector and parasite attraction in transmission dynamics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Host preference of field-derivedEcosphere (Washington, D.C) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pieter T J JohnsonEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA. Electronic address: pieter.johnson@colorado.edu.
Dana M CalhounEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Tawni B RiepeEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Janet KoprivnikarDepartment of Chemistry and Biology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Colorado Boulder · USToronto Metropolitan University · CA

Funding

EID disease in complex communities: multi-host multi-pathogen interactionsR01GM109499 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI BRIGGS, CHERYL J · 2013 to 2016
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ongoing debate over the relationship between biodiversity and disease risk underscores the need to develop a more mechanistic understanding of how changes in host community composition influence parasite transmission, particularly in complex communities with multiple hosts. A key challenge involves determining how motile parasites select among potential hosts and the degree to which this process shifts with community composition. Focusing on interactions between larval amphibians and the pathogenic trematode Ribeiroia ondatrae, we designed a novel, large-volume set of choice chambers to assess how the selectivity of free-swimming infectious parasites varied among five host species and in response to changes in assemblage composition (four different permutations). In a second set of trials, cercariae were allowed to contact and infect hosts, allowing comparison of host-parasite encounter rates (parasite choice) with infection outcomes (successful infections). Cercariae exhibited consistent preferences for specific host species that were independent of the community context; large-bodied amphibians, such as larval bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana), exhibited the highest level of parasite attraction. However, because host attractiveness was decoupled from susceptibility to infection, assemblage composition sharply affected both per-host infection as well as total infection (summed among co-occurring hosts). Species such as the non-native R. catesbeiana functioned as epidemiological 'sinks' or dilution hosts, attracting a disproportionate fraction of parasites relative to the number that established successfully, whereas Taricha granulosa and especially Pseudacris regilla supported comparatively more metacercariae relative to cercariae selection. These findings provide a framework for integrating information on parasite preference in combination with more traditional factors such as host competence and density to forecast how changes within complex communities will affect parasite transmission.

Indexed as

Host SpecificityAnimalsAnuraBiodiversityTrematodaTrematode InfectionsBehaviourBiodiversityHost susceptibilityMultiple hostParasite preference

Identifiers

PMID30894285
PMCPMC6456413
OpenAlexW2922253191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.