ArticleLancet (London, England)2019
Retraction-Cardiac stem cells in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO): initial results of a randomised phase 1 trial.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellular senescence and cell therapy in cardiovascular diseases.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Injectable Stem Cell-Based Therapies for Myocardial Regeneration: A Review of the Literature.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Cardiac progenitor cell therapy: mechanisms of action.Cell & bioscience · 2024Review
- Who Should Be Accountable for Scientific Accountability?JACC. Basic to translational science · 2023Article
- Unlocking the Pragmatic Potential of Regenerative Therapies in Heart Failure with Next-Generation Treatments.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- The Progress of Stem Cell Therapy in Myocardial-Infarcted Heart Regeneration: Cell Sheet Technology.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Review
- Myocardial regeneration protocols towards the routine clinical scenario: An unseemly path from bench to bedside.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Review
- Cell therapy in patients with heart failure: a comprehensive review and emerging concepts.Cardiovascular research · 2022Review
- Cardiac regeneration following myocardial infarction: the need for regeneration and a review of cardiac stromal cell populations used for transplantation.Biochemical Society transactions · 2022Review
- [Cardiac cell therapy-Lost in translation?]Zeitschrift fur Herz-, Thorax- und Gefasschirurgie · 2022Review
- Fake It Till You Make It: What Every Translational Investigator Can Learn From the Rise and Fall of Theranos.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2022Article
- Review
- After the storm: an objective appraisal of the efficacy of c-kit+ cardiac progenitor cells in preclinical models of heart disease.Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology · 2021Review
- Differentiation of Human Cardiac Atrial Appendage Stem Cells into Adult Cardiomyocytes: A Role for the Wnt Pathway?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Review
- Function Follows Form - A Review of Cardiac Cell Therapy.Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.