Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30894212›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2019

Phase 1/2 study of epacadostat in combination with ipilimumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

Geoffrey T Gibney, Omid Hamid, Jose Lutzky, Anthony J Olszanski, Tara C Mitchell, Thomas F Gajewski, Bartosz Chmielowski, Brent A Hanks, Yufan Zhao, Robert C Newton and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01604889 (A Phase 1/2 Randomized, Blinded, Placebo Controlled Study of Ipilimumab in Combination With Epacadostat or Placebo in Subjects With Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01604889 phase1 / phase2terminatednot on this map

A Phase 1/2 Randomized, Blinded, Placebo Controlled Study of Ipilimumab in Combination With Epacadostat or Placebo in Subjects With Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorIncyte CorporationRan2012 to 2017Enrolled50ConditionsMelanomaArmsEpacadostat, ipilimumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. The immunology of human breast cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Plasmid DNA ionisable lipid nanoparticles as non-inert carriers and potent immune activators for cancer immunotherapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Interactions of Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-expressing LAMP3Cancer communications (London, England) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Tryptophan and Substance Abuse: Mechanisms and Impact.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Geoffrey T GibneyDonald A. Adam Melanoma and Skin Cancer Research Center of Excellence, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, USA. geoffrey.t.gibney@gunet.georgetown.edu.
Omid HamidMelanoma and Skin Cancers Center, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, 11818 Wilshire Blvd, Suite #200, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jose LutzkyDivision of Hematology & Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 4306 Alton Rd, Miami Beach, FL, USA.
Anthony J OlszanskiDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tara C MitchellDivision of Hematology Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thomas F GajewskiDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC2115, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bartosz ChmielowskiJonsson Comprehensive Medical Center, University of California, Los Angeles, 10945 Le Conte Ave #2339, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Brent A HanksDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 20 Duke Medicine Cir, Durham, NC, USA.
Yufan ZhaoIncyte Corporation, 1801 Augustine Cutoff, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Robert C NewtonIncyte Corporation, 1801 Augustine Cutoff, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Janet MaleskiIncyte Corporation, 1801 Augustine Cutoff, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Lance LeopoldIncyte Corporation, 1801 Augustine Cutoff, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Jeffrey S WeberDonald A. Adam Melanoma and Skin Cancer Research Center of Excellence, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

Melanoma-mediated Dendritic Cell Tolerization and Immune EvasionK08CA191063 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HANKS, BRENT ALLEN · 2015 to 2019
$826k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA191063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpacadostat is a potent inhibitor of the immunosuppressive indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) enzyme. We present phase 1 results from a phase 1/2 clinical study of epacadostat in combination with ipilimumab, an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibody, in advanced melanoma (NCT01604889).

methodsOnly the phase 1, open-label portion of the study was conducted, per the sponsor's decision to terminate the study early based on the changing melanoma treatment landscape favoring exploration of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand 1 inhibitor-based combination strategies. Such decision was not related to the safety of epacadostat plus ipilimumab. Patients received oral epacadostat (25, 50, 100, or 300 mg twice daily [BID]; 75 mg daily [50 mg AM, 25 mg PM]; or 50 mg BID intermittent [2 weeks on/1 week off]) plus intravenous ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks.

resultsFifty patients received ≥1 dose of epacadostat. As of January 20, 2017, 2 patients completed treatment and 48 discontinued, primarily because of adverse events (AEs) and disease progression (n = 20 each). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 11 patients (n = 1 each with epacadostat 25 mg BID, 50 mg BID intermittent, 75 mg daily; n = 4 each with epacadostat 50 mg BID, 300 mg BID). The most common immune-related treatment-emergent AEs included rash (50%), alanine aminotransferase elevation (28%), pruritus (28%), aspartate aminotransferase elevation (24%), and hypothyroidism (10%). Among immunotherapy-naive patients (n = 39), the objective response rate was 26% by immune-related response criteria and 23% by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. No objective response was seen in the 11 patients who received prior immunotherapy. Epacadostat exposure was dose proportional, with clinically significant IDO1 inhibition at doses ≥25 mg BID.

conclusionsWhen combined with ipilimumab, epacadostat ≤50 mg BID demonstrated clinical and pharmacologic activity and was generally well tolerated in patients with advanced melanoma.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01604889 . Registration date, May 9, 2012, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansIpilimumabMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisOximesSulfonamidesTreatment OutcomeepacadostatIpilimumabOximesSulfonamidesEpacadostatIDO1Immune checkpoint inhibitionIpilimumabMelanoma

Identifiers

PMID30894212
PMCPMC6425606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.