ArticleBiomedical engineering online2019
CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a bibliometric analysis of the 5-year trends in literature.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning applied to retinal image processing for glaucoma detection: review and perspective.Biomedical engineering online · 2020Pooled it
- AUBADE-syn: a novel deep learning ensemble method for glaucoma detection using synthetic fundus images on imbalanced datasets.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Key concept learning for medical vision language model with reasoning capabilities.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A hybrid dual-stream CNN framework with dynamic data augmentation and improved Manta Ray Foraging Optimization for robust glaucoma detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- How Far Have Large Language Models Advanced in Ophthalmology? A Systematic Review of Their Development, Evaluation, and Readiness for Clinical Use.Research square · 2026Article
- Article
- Code-Free Machine Learning for the Detection of Common Ophthalmic Diseases.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- ODDM: Integration of SMOTE Tomek with Deep Learning on Imbalanced Color Fundus Images for Classification of Several Ocular Diseases.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Enhancing diagnostic accuracy in rare and common fundus diseases with a knowledge-rich vision-language model.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Detection of Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia Using Artificial Intelligence With Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Comparing No-Code Platforms and Deep Learning Models for Glaucoma Detection From Fundus Images.Cureus · 2025Article
- A hybrid multi model artificial intelligence approach for glaucoma screening using fundus images.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Multiple model visual feature embedding and selection method for an efficient oncular disease classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep Learning in Glaucoma Detection and Progression Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- A generalised computer vision model for improved glaucoma screening using fundus images.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- A Robust Approach to Early Glaucoma Identification from Retinal Fundus Images using Dirichlet-based Weighted Average Ensemble and Bayesian OptimizationCurrent medical imaging · 2025Article
- Towards efficient glaucoma screening with modular convolution-involution cascade architecture.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Multimodality Fusion Strategies in Eye Disease Diagnosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost current algorithms for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images rely on handcrafted features based on segmentation, which are affected by the performance of the chosen segmentation method and the extracted features. Among other characteristics, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are known because of their ability to learn highly discriminative features from raw pixel intensities.
methodsIn this paper, we employed five different ImageNet-trained models (VGG16, VGG19, InceptionV3, ResNet50 and Xception) for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images. Results from an extensive validation using cross-validation and cross-testing strategies were compared with previous works in the literature.
resultsUsing five public databases (1707 images), an average AUC of 0.9605 with a 95% confidence interval of 95.92-97.07%, an average specificity of 0.8580 and an average sensitivity of 0.9346 were obtained after using the Xception architecture, significantly improving the performance of other state-of-the-art works. Moreover, a new clinical database, ACRIMA, has been made publicly available, containing 705 labelled images. It is composed of 396 glaucomatous images and 309 normal images, which means, the largest public database for glaucoma diagnosis. The high specificity and sensitivity obtained from the proposed approach are supported by an extensive validation using not only the cross-validation strategy but also the cross-testing validation on, to the best of the authors' knowledge, all publicly available glaucoma-labelled databases.
conclusionsThese results suggest that using ImageNet-trained models is a robust alternative for automatic glaucoma screening system. All images, CNN weights and software used to fine-tune and test the five CNNs are publicly available, which could be used as a testbed for further comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.