ArticleBMC public health2019
Organizational-level determinants of participation in workplace health promotion programs: a cross-company study.
Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Enhancing the Health of NHS Staff: eTHOS-a randomised controlled pilot trial of an employee health screening clinic for NHS staff compared with usual care to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
- Factors influencing the implementation of workplace-based health interventions for non-communicable disease prevention: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Employee expectations towards employer-provided workplace health promotion and mental health support: a 2025 cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Safeguarding the bedrock of our healthcare system: recommendations to strengthen healthcare worker health in tertiary healthcare institutions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Improving employer and employee well-being in small and medium-sized enterprises in Flanders: a realist evaluation protocol of the FitBonus program.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Review
- Lifestyle counselling by Dutch occupational health professionals and its determinants: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- In or out of reach? Long-term trends in the reach of health assessments in the Swedish occupational setting.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2024Article
- The Potentials of Digital Workplace Health Promotion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Healthy Lifestyle Intervention at Workplaces in South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Reach and effectiveness of a worksite health promotion program combining a preventive medical examination with motivational interviewing; a quasi-experimental study among workers in low socioeconomic position.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Is It Time to Re-Shift the Research Agenda? A Scoping Review of Participation Rates in Workplace Health Promotion Programs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Perceptions of employees with a low and medium level of education towards workplace health promotion programmes: a mixed-methods study.BMC public health · 2022Article
- A German Model Project for Workplace Health Promotion-Flow of Communication, Information, and Reasons for Non-Participation in the Offered Measures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- STAR-VITAL, a Four Year Comprehensive Workplace Health Promotion Program: Study Design.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Perceived Supervisor Support for Health Affects Presenteeism: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- An Evaluation of a Commercialized mHealth Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in the Workplace.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- The role of the occupational physician in controlling gastric cancer attributable toPreventive medicine reports · 2021Review
- How Managers Perceive and (Do Not) Participate in Health Promotion Measures-Results from a Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Survey in a Large ICT Company.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAttracted by the expected benefits such as reduced absenteeism and increased productivity, more and more firms decide to implement workplace health promotion programs (WHPPs). However, those programs can only be effective if employees actually participate. This study aims to (1) gain insight into the degree of enrolment rates in such programs across companies and (2) identify organizational level factors that are associated with employee participation. Building on existing theory on organizational drivers of participation in corporate wellness programs, the study's main goal is to investigate which organizational factors determine whether employees enroll in a corporate fitness program or not.
methodsA business-to-business fitness platform company provided organizational level data on 61 client firms that have recently implemented a corporate wellness program. The data contained information on the enrolment rate per company and different organizational level variables. The following potential determinants of participation were analyzed: firm size, organizational program support and employee co-payment. A random effects model was used to examine associations between potential determinants and the program enrolment rate.
resultsThe average participation is limited (15.37%) but varies highly across companies (range 0.07-100.00%, monthly basis). Looking at the determinants of program enrolment, we find that organizational program support - the degree to which firm leadership encourages participation - positively influences the enrolment rate (β = 0.051 p < 0.001) while employee co-payment - the financial contribution employees have to make to participate - has a negative impact (β = - 0.002, p < 0.001). Furthermore, firm size has a negative relationship with firm enrolment.
conclusionsEnrolment rates in WHPPs are limited, as many companies have difficulties to promote participation in WHPPs among employees. Strong organizational program support and low employee co-payment were identified as drivers of employee participation in corporate health programs. Hence, intensifying both social and financial support of employee participation may help to drive enrolment rates. Firm size was found to negatively affect the enrolment rate in WHPPs, implying that larger firms have to account for their size and corresponding complexity when implementing such a program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.