Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30894160›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Organizational-level determinants of participation in workplace health promotion programs: a cross-company study.

Liesa Marie Lier, Christoph Breuer, Sören Dallmeyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Potentials of Digital Workplace Health Promotion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  11. Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Healthy Lifestyle Intervention at Workplaces in South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. STAR-VITAL, a Four Year Comprehensive Workplace Health Promotion Program: Study Design.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Perceived Supervisor Support for Health Affects Presenteeism: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liesa Marie LierInstitute of Sport Economics and Sport Management, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany. liesa.lier@web.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8991-9010
Christoph BreuerInstitute of Sport Economics and Sport Management, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sören DallmeyerInstitute of Sport Economics and Sport Management, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
German Sport University Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttracted by the expected benefits such as reduced absenteeism and increased productivity, more and more firms decide to implement workplace health promotion programs (WHPPs). However, those programs can only be effective if employees actually participate. This study aims to (1) gain insight into the degree of enrolment rates in such programs across companies and (2) identify organizational level factors that are associated with employee participation. Building on existing theory on organizational drivers of participation in corporate wellness programs, the study's main goal is to investigate which organizational factors determine whether employees enroll in a corporate fitness program or not.

methodsA business-to-business fitness platform company provided organizational level data on 61 client firms that have recently implemented a corporate wellness program. The data contained information on the enrolment rate per company and different organizational level variables. The following potential determinants of participation were analyzed: firm size, organizational program support and employee co-payment. A random effects model was used to examine associations between potential determinants and the program enrolment rate.

resultsThe average participation is limited (15.37%) but varies highly across companies (range 0.07-100.00%, monthly basis). Looking at the determinants of program enrolment, we find that organizational program support - the degree to which firm leadership encourages participation - positively influences the enrolment rate (β = 0.051 p < 0.001) while employee co-payment - the financial contribution employees have to make to participate - has a negative impact (β = - 0.002, p < 0.001). Furthermore, firm size has a negative relationship with firm enrolment.

conclusionsEnrolment rates in WHPPs are limited, as many companies have difficulties to promote participation in WHPPs among employees. Strong organizational program support and low employee co-payment were identified as drivers of employee participation in corporate health programs. Hence, intensifying both social and financial support of employee participation may help to drive enrolment rates. Firm size was found to negatively affect the enrolment rate in WHPPs, implying that larger firms have to account for their size and corresponding complexity when implementing such a program.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthWork EngagementFinancial SupportHumansOrganizational CultureProgram EvaluationSocial SupportWorkplaceEmployee participationImplementation effectivenessOrganization level determinantsPhysical activityWorkplace health promotion

Identifiers

PMID30894160
PMCPMC6427860
OpenAlexW2947239413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.