ReviewBMC complementary and alternative medicine2019
A critical integrative review of complementary medicine education research: key issues and empirical gaps.
Review in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing a conceptual framework to facilitate inter-organizational partnership in disasters and public health emergencies.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Barriers to communication about complementary and alternative medicine between oncology patients and healthcare professionals in Croatia: a cross-sectional study.Korean journal of medical education · 2025Article
- Workforce, regulation and capacity needed for integration of traditional medicine.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025Article
- Pharmacological risks of khat-oral antidiabetic drug interactions among patients at Gondar university referral hospital.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the intersection of brain-computer interfaces and traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine.Integrative medicine research · 2025Article
- How can meta-research be used to evaluate and improve the quality of research in the field of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine?Integrative medicine research · 2024Article
- Mental Health Literacy and Education of Complementary Medicine Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study.Administration and policy in mental health · 2024Article
- Evidence-Based Opinions from Multidisciplinary Experts on Use of Naturopathic Herbal Remedies in Pain Management.Journal of pain research · 2024Review
- How does evidence-based medicine training affect medical students' views on traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine and the conspiracy theories about COVID-19: a nationwide study.Primary health care research & development · 2023Article
- The engagement of psychology with complementary medicine: A critical integrative review.Heliyon · 2023Review
- COVID-19 and Massage Therapy Education Impact and Future Implications.International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork · 2022Article
- Evaluation of home-based naturopathic telehealth clinic: an innovative COVID-19 pandemic response.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- What traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine recommendations exist across osteoporosis clinical practice guidelines? A systematic review and quality assessment.Integrative medicine research · 2022Review
- Developing a best practice framework for clinical competency education in the traditional East-Asian medicine curriculum.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Complementary and alternative medicine use in infertility: A review of infertile women's needs.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Review
- Naturopathy, complementary and integrative medicine in medical education - position paper by the GMA Committee Integrative Medicine and Perspective Pluralism.GMS journal for medical education · 2022Article
- Community education and health promotion activities of naturopathic practitioners: results of an international cross-sectional survey.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Article
- Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Article
- Integrative Medicine in General Practice in Australia: A Mixed-Methods Study Exploring Education Pathways and Training Needs.Global advances in health and medicine · 2021Article
- Involving Medical Students in the Curriculum Development of Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplementary Medicine (CM) continues to thrive across many countries. Closely related to the continuing popularity of CM has been an increased number of enrolments at CM education institutions across the public and private tertiary sectors. Despite the popularity of CM across the globe and growth in CM education/education providers, to date, there has been no critical review of peer-reviewed research examining CM education undertaken. In direct response to this important gap, this paper reports the first critical review of contemporary literature examining CM education research.
methodsA review was undertaken of research to identify empirical research papers reporting on CM education published between 2005 and 17. The search was conducted in May 2017 and included the search of PubMed and EBSCO (CINAHL, MEDLINE, AMED) for search terms embracing CM and education. Identified studies were evaluated using the STROBE, SRQP and MMAT appraisal tools.
resultsFrom 9496 identified papers, 18 met the review inclusion criteria (English language, original empirical research data, reporting on the prevalence or nature of the education of CM practitioners), and highlighted four broad issues: CM education provision; the development of educational competencies to develop clinical skills and standards; the application of new educational theory, methods and technology in CM; and future challenges facing CM education. This critical integrative review highlights two key issues of interest and significance for CM educational institutions, CM regulators and researchers, and points to number of significant gaps in this area of research. There is very sporadic coverage of research in CM education. The clear absence of the robust and mature research regarding educational technology and e-learning taking place in medical and or allied health education research is notably absent within CM educational research.
conclusionDespite the high levels of CM use in the community, and the thriving nature of CM educational institutions globally, the current evidence evaluating the procedures, effectiveness and outcomes of CM education remains limited on a number of fronts. There is an urgent need to establish a strategic research agenda around this important aspect of health care education with the overarching goal to ensure a well-educated and effective health care workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.