ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2019
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Postoperative Recovery Index of patients undergoing surgical intervention
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04389515 (Evaluation of Pregnant Women Diagnosed With COVID-19 With "Post-operative Recovery Index" and "Prenatal Care Satisfaction and Patient Expectations Scale"), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Pregnant Women Diagnosed With COVID-19 With "Post-operative Recovery Index" and "Prenatal Care Satisfaction and Patient Expectations Scale"
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Preoperative Mobilization Education Using the Teach-Back Method on Patient Outcomes After Gynecological Surgery: A Randomized-Controlled Study.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Trial
- The effect of local anaesthetic agents on opioid use and recovery in patients undergoing open heart surgery: a randomized controlled study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Trial
- The moderating role of sociodemographic characteristics and health behaviours in the relationship between daily living activities and postoperative recovery in CABG patients.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- The relationship between perceived safety and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing surgery with regional anesthesia: a cross-sectional study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Assessing the relationship between preoperative anxiety and postoperative recovery.BMC surgery · 2026Observational
- The relationship between preoperative anxiety and postoperative recovery index in laparoscopic abdominal surgery patients.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Effects of TTP-PECS Block Under Opioid-Sparing General Anesthesia on Postoperative Analgesia and Early Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- Care dependency and postoperative recovery after total knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The effect of recovery status and life conditions on the quality of life in colorectal cancer patients with stoma: a path analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Measuring job stress of dental workers in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: reliability and validity of the hospital consultants' job stress questionnaire.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Form of Post-Discharge Surgical Recovery Scale.Florence Nightingale journal of nursing · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: For the purpose of providing the optimal postoperative care for patients and assisting them in terms of recovery, their health conditions and particular symptoms should be evaluated systematically with an appropriate measurement tool. This research was designed with the purpose of conducting the validity and reliability study of the Postoperative Recovery Index-Turkish Version (PoRITR) and determining the postoperative recovery conditions. Materials and methods: The sample of this study, which was planned methodologically and analytically, consisted of 382 patients who had a surgical intervention in a university hospital between September 2016 and June 2017. Analyses concerning the Turkish validity and reliability of the PoRI-TR were conducted. In the evaluation, a patient information form, the PoRI-TR, and the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire (QoR-40) were used. Results: The PoRI-TR point average was calculated as 3.39 ± 0.916 and the Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient was calculated as α = 0.967. It was determined that the five-factor structure of the PoRI-TR, which was reduced from 37 items to 25, was adapted well. Conclusion: It was seen that the PoRI-TR is a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.