ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019
Suitability of Metal Block Augmentation for Large Uncontained Bone Defect in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Updates in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2024Article
- Biomechanical Efficacy of Three Methods for the Fixation of Posterior Malleolar Fractures: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Stability of Three-Dimensional Printed Custom-Made Metaphyseal Cone for Tibial Bone Defects Reconstruction: A Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Porous metal block based on topology optimization to treat distal femoral bone defect in total knee revision.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2023Article
- Application strategy of finite element analysis in artificial knee arthroplasty.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Prostheses option in revision total knee arthroplasty, from the bench to the bedside: (1) basic science and principles.EFORT open reviews · 2022Review
- Biomechanical Comparison Between Porous Ti6Al4V Block and Tumor Prosthesis UHMWPE Block for the Treatment of Distal Femur Bone Defects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- [Bone defect management in revision knee arthroplasty].Der Orthopade · 2021Review
- Design of Porous Metal Block Augmentation to Treat Tibial Bone Defects in Total Knee Arthroplasty Based on Topology Optimization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Article
- [Individual revision arthroplasty of the knee joint].Der Orthopade · 2020Review
- Preoperative Evaluation of V-Y Flap Design Based on Computer-Aided Analysis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2020Article
- Complications in Total Joint Arthroplasties.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study was performed to determine whether metal block augmentation is suitable for large uncontained bone defect via evaluations of differences in biomechanical characteristics among the configurations of metal block augmentations for medium or large uncontained bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Three-dimensional finite element (FE) models of the proximal tibia with revision TKA were developed and analyzed considering the configurations of the metal block augmentations for medium and large uncontained bone defects. To identify differences in biomechanical characteristics according to the configurations of metal block augmentations, the stress transfer, strain distribution, and peak von Mises stresses (PVMSs) were assessed. Large and medium uncontained bone defects had similar ranges of strain below the critical bone-damage strain for the metal block augmentations, but the strain distribution characteristics differed in response to the metal block-augmentation configurations. PVMSs exceeding the yield strength of the bone cement for the single metal block-augmentation configurations were, on average, 1.4 times higher than those for double metal block-augmentation configurations for both medium and large uncontained bone defects. These findings suggest that metal block augmentation may be suitable for large uncontained bone defects (≤20 mm), compared with the results obtained for metal block augmentation used in medium uncontained bone defects (≤10 mm). If possible, double metal block augmentation is recommended for both medium and large uncontained bone defects rather than single metal block augmentation. It is also recommended that the metal block augmentation should be customized to meet the contact characteristics with the cortical bone, thereby ensuring better stress transfer and reducing the risk of the bone resorption due to stress shielding and bone-cement failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.