ReviewToxics2019
Exploration of Computational Approaches to Predict the Toxicity of Chemical Mixtures.
Review in Toxics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting the Toxicity In Silico of the Aqueous Extract ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cylindrospermopsin toxicokinetics: in silico ADMET modeling, rat and human liver microsome metabolism, and UHPLC-MS/MS metabolite characterization.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Pesticide Residues in Vegetables: The Potential Risk Assessment of Endocrine and Reproductive Disruptors for Children and Adults.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Study on the Molecular Dynamics of 2‑(4-Fluorophenyl)-6-methyl-4-(3- (trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1,2-dihydrodipyrazolo[3,4-b:3',4'‑ACS omega · 2025Article
- Mathematical models for predicting the toxicity of micropollutant mixtures in water.Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju · 2025Review
- Equations for estimating binary mixture toxicity: Methyl-2-chloroacetoacetate-containing combinations.Toxicology reports · 2025Article
- Developmental programming: Sex-specific effects of prenatal exposure to a real-life mixture of environmental chemicals on liver function and transcriptome in sheep.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2025Article
- Assessment of embryotoxic effects of quinoline yellow using attention-based convolutional neural network and machine learning in zebrafish model.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Research trends of computational toxicology: a bibliometric analysis.Toxicology research · 2024Review
- Air-liquid interface exposure of A549 human lung cells to characterize the hazard potential of a gaseous bio-hybrid fuel blend.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- In-Silico Drug Toxicity and Interaction Prediction for Plant Complexes Based on Virtual Screening and Text Mining.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Replacement of animal testing by integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA): a call for in vivitrosi.Archives of toxicology · 2022Review
- Article
- Current Strategies in Assessment of Nanotoxicity: Alternatives to In Vivo Animal Testing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Industrial advances have led to generation of multi-component chemicals, materials and pharmaceuticals which are directly or indirectly affecting the environment. Although toxicity data are available for individual chemicals, generally there is no toxicity data of chemical mixtures. Most importantly, the nature of toxicity of these studied mixtures is completely different to the single components, which makes the toxicity evaluation of mixtures more critical and challenging. Interactions of individual chemicals in a mixture can result in multifaceted and considerable deviations in the apparent properties of its ingredients. It results in synergistic or antagonistic effects as opposed to the ideal case of additive behavior i.e., concentration addition (CA) and independent action (IA). The CA and IA are leading models for the assessment of joint activity supported by pharmacology literature. Animal models for toxicity testing are time- and money-consuming as well as unethical. Thus, computational approaches are already proven efficient alternatives for assessing the toxicity of chemicals by regulatory authorities followed by industries. In silico methods are capable of predicting toxicity, prioritizing chemicals, identifying risk and assessing, followed by managing, the risk. In many cases, the mechanism behind the toxicity from species to species can be understood by in silico methods. Until today most of the computational approaches have been employed for single chemical's toxicity. Thus, only a handful of works in the literature and methods are available for a mixture's toxicity prediction employing computational or in silico approaches. Therefore, the present review explains the importance of evaluation of a mixture's toxicity, the role of computational approaches to assess the toxicity, followed by types of in silico methods. Additionally, successful application of in silico tools in a mixture's toxicity predictions is explained in detail. Finally, future avenues towards the role and application of computational approaches in a mixture's toxicity are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.