Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30893632›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2019

Chemotherapy Modulates Endocrine Therapy-Related Resistance Mutations in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Dabo Zhou, Quchang Ouyang, Liping Liu, Jingyu Liu, Yu Tang, Mengjia Xiao, Yikai Wang, Qiongzhi He, Zhe-Yu Hu

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Aging · 2020
    Article
  9. Detection ofFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dabo ZhouThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University / Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Quchang OuyangThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University / Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China. Electronic address: oyqc1969@126.com.
Liping LiuThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University / Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Jingyu LiuThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University / Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Yu TangThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University / Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Mengjia XiaoThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University / Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Yikai WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, 33022, USA.
Qiongzhi HeGeneplus Beijing Institute, Beijing 102206, China.
Zhe-Yu HuThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University / Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China; Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China. Electronic address: huzheyu@hnszlyy.com.
Hunan Cancer Hospital · CNCentral South University · CNEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccumulation of PIK3CA, ESR1, and GATA3 mutations results in resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients; however, the response of these genes to chemotherapy is unclear. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the genetic response of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients.

methodsThe mutation frequency of 1021 genes was examined prior to chemotherapy in ctDNA of 44 estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. These genes were evaluated again in a subset of patients (n=24) following chemotherapy. Mutation frequency was defined as the percentage of mutations found in ctDNA compared to total cell-free DNA.

resultsPrior to chemotherapy, PIK3CA was the most commonly mutated gene, with mutation found in 22 of the metastatic breast cancer patients. Following chemotherapy, 16 patients exhibited progressive disease (PD), and 8 patients experienced no progression (non-PD). PIK3CA mutation frequency increased in 56.25% (9/16) of the PD patients but decreased in 62.5% (5/8) of the non-PD patients. As a result, more PD patients exhibited increased PIK3CA mutation frequency than non-PD patients (56.25% vs 0%, P=.002). Further, ESR1 and GATA3 mutations correlated with PIK3CA mutation. Interestingly, patients receiving the mTOR inhibitor everolimus exhibited a lower progression rate (0% vs 62.5%, P=.001), and the combination of everolimus and chemotherapy effectively suppressed PIK3CA, ESR1, and GATA3 gene mutations.

conclusionTogether, these results suggest that mTOR inhibition may be a useful chemotherapy adjuvant to suppress chemotherapy-induced gene mutations that render tumors resistant to endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients with PD.

Identifiers

PMID30893632
PMCPMC6423490
OpenAlexW2921196430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.