Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30893577›Full record

Trial reportAmerican heart journal2019

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist pre-treatment and early post-treatment to minimize reperfusion injury after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: The MINIMIZE STEMI trial.

Heerajnarain Bulluck, Georg M Fröhlich, Jennifer M Nicholas, Shah Mohdnazri, Reto Gamma, John Davies, Alex Sirker, Anthony Mathur, Daniel Blackman, Pankaj Garg and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American heart journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020
    Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Primary Aldosteronism and Ischemic Heart Disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Heerajnarain BulluckHatter Cardiovascular Institute, London, United Kingdom; Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Georg M FröhlichHatter Cardiovascular Institute, London, United Kingdom; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Jennifer M NicholasLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Shah MohdnazriEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Reto GammaEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
John DaviesEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Alex SirkerBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Anthony MathurBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel BlackmanLeeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Pankaj GargLeeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
James C MoonBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The National Institute of Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.
John P GreenwoodLeeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Derek J HausenloyHatter Cardiovascular Institute, London, United Kingdom; Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The National Institute of Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore; Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore; Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Biotecnologia-FEMSA, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Electronic address: derek.hausenloy@duke-nus.edu.sg.

Funding

British Heart Foundation CS/14/3/31002British Heart Foundation FS/10/40/28260British Heart Foundation FS/12/56/29723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) therapy has been shown to prevent adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with heart failure. Whether initiating MRA therapy prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) accrues additional benefit of reducing myocardial infarct size and preventing adverse LV remodeling is not known. We aimed to investigate whether MRA therapy initiated prior to reperfusion reduces myocardial infarct (MI) size and prevents adverse LV remodeling in STEMI patients.

methodsSTEMI patients presenting within 12 hours and with a proximal coronary artery occlusion with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0 were consented and randomized to either an intravenous bolus of potassium canrenoate, followed by oral spironolactone for 3 months or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was MI size by cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 months.

resultsSixty-seven patients completed the study. There was no significant difference in the final MI size at 3 months between the 2 groups (placebo: 17 ± 11%, MRA: 16 ± 10%, P = .574). There was also no difference in acute MI size (26 ± 16% versus 23 ± 14%, P = .425) or myocardial salvage (26 ± 12% versus 24 ± 8%, P = .456). At follow-up, there was a trend towards an improvement in LVEF (placebo: 49 ± 8%, MRA: 54 ± 11%, P = .053), and the MRA group had significantly greater percentage decrease in LVEDV (mean difference: -12.2 (95% CI -20.3 to -4.4)%, P = .003) and LVESV (mean difference: -18.2 (95% CI -30.1 to -6.3)%, P = .003).

conclusionThis pilot study showed no benefit of MRA therapy in reducing MI size in STEMI patients when initiated prior to reperfusion, but there was an improvement in LV remodeling at 3 months. Adequately powered studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedCanrenoic AcidCardiac Imaging TechniquesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryPilot ProjectsProof of Concept StudySpironolactoneST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionCanrenoic AcidMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsSpironolactone

Identifiers

PMID30893577
PMCPMC6483973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.