Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30893430›Full record

Trial reportAesthetic surgery journal2020

Liquid Formulation of AbobotulinumtoxinA: A 6-Month, Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of a Single Treatment, Ready-to-Use Toxin for Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines.

Benjamin Ascher, Berthold Rzany, Philippe Kestemont, Said Hilton, Marc Heckmann, Isaac Bodokh, Ernst Magnus Noah, Dominique Boineau, Martina Kerscher, Magali Volteau and 2 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02353871 (A Phase III, Double Blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled Study To Assess The Efficacy And Safety Of A Single Treatment Of Clostridium Botulinum Toxin Type A To Improve The Appearance Of Moderate To Severe Glabellar Lines), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02353871 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Double Blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled Study To Assess The Efficacy And Safety Of A Single Treatment Of Clostridium Botulinum Toxin Type A To Improve The Appearance Of Moderate To Severe Glabellar Lines

TypeinterventionalSponsorIpsenRan2015 to 2015Enrolled185ConditionsModerate to Severe Glabellar LinesArmsBotulinum toxin type A, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Botulinum toxin type A for facial wrinkles.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. [New botulinum toxins for aesthetic dermatology : A comprehensive review].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Benjamin AscherIena Plastic Surgery Clinic, Paris, France.
Berthold RzanyRZANY & HUND in Berlin, Germany.
Philippe KestemontMedici Centre, Antibes-Juan Les Pins, France.
Said HiltonDr. Hilton & Partner in Düsseldorf, Germany.
Marc HeckmannStarnberg Skin Centre, Starnberg, Germany.
Isaac BodokhDepartment of Dermatology, Cannes Hospital, Cannes, France.
Ernst Magnus NoahDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Kassel, Germany.
Dominique BoineauClinique Chirurgicale Bel-Air in Bordeaux, France.
Martina KerscherDivision of Cosmetic Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Magali VolteauNeurology Development, Ipsen Innovation, Les Ulis, Paris, France.
Philippe Le BerreNeurology Development, Ipsen Innovation, Les Ulis, Paris, France.
Philippe PicautNeurology Development, Ipsen Innovation, Les Ulis, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafety and efficacy of botulinum toxin A for glabellar line (GL) treatment are well established. Currently approved formulations require reconstitution before injection.

objectivesThe authors sought to assess 6-month efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of new ready-to-use abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection (ASI) in patients with moderate-to-severe GL at maximum frown.

methodsThe authors conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02353871). Patients (N = 185) were randomized (2:1) to receive ASI 50 U or placebo. GL severity was evaluated at days 8, 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 148, and 183 employing a 4-point scale for investigator's live assessment (ILA) and subject's self-assessment (SSA). Primary endpoint was ILA of GL at maximum frown at day 29, and secondary endpoints were ILA and SSA of GL at maximum frown (all time points), patient satisfaction with GL appearance, time to onset, and duration of action.

resultsResponder rates were significantly higher for ASI vs placebo (88.3% vs 1.4%; P < 0.0001) at day 29 by ILA and all time points by ILA (P < 0.0001-0.0441) and SSA (P < 0.0001-0.0036). Sixty percent of patients reported onset of treatment response on or before day 3 (P < 0.0001 vs placebo), and in 5% of patients, efficacy by ILA lasted 6 months (day 183; P = 0.0441 vs placebo). Patient satisfaction rates were significantly higher for ASI vs placebo at all visits (P < 0.0001). Safety was comparable with the known abobotulinumtoxinA profile.

conclusionsASI was significantly efficacious for improving moderate or severe GL vs placebo by investigator and patient assessment. ASI was associated with high patient satisfaction, a long duration of action, and comparable safety profile to abobotulinumtoxinA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1:

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular AgentsSkin AgingDouble-Blind MethodForeheadHumansTreatment OutcomeabobotulinumtoxinABotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agents

Identifiers

PMID30893430
PMCPMC6923737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.