Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30893424›Full record

ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2019

Clinical Utility of PNA-FISH for Burn Wound Diagnostics: A Noninvasive, Culture-Independent Technique for Rapid Identification of Pathogenic Organisms in Burn Wounds.

Alan J Weaver, Kenneth S Brandenburg, Fatemeh Sanjar, Adrienne R Wells, Trent J Peacock, Kai P Leung

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Rapid and Simple Approaches for Diagnosis ofPolish journal of microbiology · 2022
    Review
  6. [Multidrug resistant organisms in burn intensive care unit: strategies and opinions].Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alan J WeaverDental and Craniofacial Trauma Research and Tissue Regeneration Directorate, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
Kenneth S BrandenburgDental and Craniofacial Trauma Research and Tissue Regeneration Directorate, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
Fatemeh SanjarDental and Craniofacial Trauma Research and Tissue Regeneration Directorate, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
Adrienne R WellsDental and Craniofacial Trauma Research and Tissue Regeneration Directorate, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
Trent J PeacockOffice of Research Compliance, Mississippi State University.
Kai P LeungDental and Craniofacial Trauma Research and Tissue Regeneration Directorate, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research · USMississippi State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn injury results in an immediate compromised skin state, which puts the affected patient at an immediate risk for infection, including sepsis. For burn patients that develop infections, it is critical to rapidly identify the etiology so that an appropriate treatment can be administered. Current clinical standards rely heavily on culture-based methods for local and systemic infection testing, which can often take days to complete. While more advanced methods (ie, MALDI or NAAT) have improved turnaround times, they may still suffer from either the need for pure culture or sensitivity and specificity issues. Peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) offers a way to reduce this time from days to hours and provide species-specific identification. While PNA-FISH has had great utility in research, its use in clinical microbiology diagnostics has been minimal (including burn wound diagnostics). This work describes a nonculture-based identification technique using commercial available U.S. FDA-approved PNA-FISH probes for the identification of common clinical pathogens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, present in burn wound infections. Additionally, calcofluor white was included for identification of Candida albicans. All three pathogens were identified from a tri-species infected deep-partial thickness rat burn wound model. These species were clearly identifiable in swab and tissue samples that were collected, with minimal autofluorescence from any species. Although autofluorescence of the tissue was present, it did not interfere or was otherwise minimized through sample preparation and analysis. The methodology developed was done so with patient care and diagnostic laboratories in mind that it might be easily transferred to the clinical setting.

Indexed as

BurnsHumansInfection ControlIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusWound Infection

Identifiers

PMID30893424
PMCPMC6587406
OpenAlexW2923893786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.